So I've been reading this eighteenth-century Milton criticism -- those of you who know a lot about this sort of thing, it's Joseph Addison's remarks from The Spectator (dated December 1711-January 1712). It's very boring and reminds me (as if I needed it) of why I can't abide neoclassicism: it feels rather like carving perhaps the greatest epic
(
Read more... )
Comments 16
Reply
Caesar is one of those plays that I really ought to like better than I do, since it's full of things that appeal to me. I don't know, though -- it's just always sort of left me cold. But I'm willing to give it another chance. (Particularly as I know it deserves better than the treatment I saw on Sunday...)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
No criticism on that pursuit from me. I once assigned Elizabethan historical and literary figures to Hogwarts houses!
Reply
I don't know about Dudley either. He seems like a mix of Hufflepuff and Slytherin traits -- i.e. loyalty and ambition.
Sorting is easier than D&D alignment, so I went ahead and tried my hand at sorting the major figures in Shakespeare's histories, because I am that big a geek:
Gryffindor: John of Gaunt (in the play; the historical Gaunt was totally Slytherin), Henry V (though Harry Monmouth, like Harry Potter, has strong Slytherin tendencies as well), Hotspur, Edward IV, Sir John Talbot, Henry of Richmond (also Slytherin historically)
Ravenclaw: Richard II, Henry VI
Hufflepuff: Edmund of York, Humphrey of Gloucester
Slytherin: Henry IV, Northumberland, Margaret of Anjou (hrm, does Beauxbatons have a devious house?), Richard of York, Warwick, and of course Richard III
(Pretty much everybody in the first tetralogy would be in Slytherin, tbh.)
I'm sure I'm missing some important people. I tried to sort Falstaff but couldn't figure out where to put him. He's got the aforementioned Slytherin/Hufflepuff thing going... ;)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment