Leave a comment

Comments 10

Jokes woodpijn March 23 2017, 12:05:44 UTC
Those are awesome! Most of them I hadn't heard before.

Reply

RE: Jokes andrewducker March 23 2017, 12:47:31 UTC
Me either! And a good spread of them too.

Reply


ext_2864067 March 23 2017, 12:26:04 UTC
The 4chan thing doesn't add up. If the person had guns, why didn't they use them?

Reply

andrewducker March 23 2017, 12:47:17 UTC
Good point there. I'm curious as to what _was_ going on.

Reply


So, You Want To Test A Nuclear Weapon? cartesiandaemon March 23 2017, 14:18:03 UTC
Sort of, though not as much as i want to see them fall into the sun

(The article was interesting, but that was my reaction to the title :))

Reply


What it's like going to the Lib-Dem party conference cartesiandaemon March 23 2017, 14:20:02 UTC
Yeah, that sounds like a lot of policies i agree with.

Apparently "radical" has been overton windowed :(

Reply

RE: What it's like going to the Lib-Dem party conference newandrewhickey March 23 2017, 16:46:47 UTC
The only policy I describe there as radical is, I think, the sex work one, which is I think a massive departure from the policies of other parties. Most of the rest are sensible incremental changes.
But referring to myself as a radical liberal (or to Tim Farron as part of the radical tradition) is not Overton windowing -- "radical liberalism" is the name for a particular tradition of thought within the Lib Dem and previously Liberal parties, and has been used for that tradition for a hundred years or more.
(It actually *is* a radical viewpoint -- closer to anarcho-syndicalism than anything else -- and exists in the Lib Dems alongside centrists, libertarians, and mainstream social democrats in an uneasy alliance)

Reply


ylla March 23 2017, 16:08:19 UTC
Why parliament *shooting*, as if the problem was with the actions of the police rather the actions of the attacker who killed two people with a car and one with a knife?

Reply

newandrewhickey March 23 2017, 16:49:31 UTC
Presumably that was the headline when the story was first posted -- now it says "Westminster attack latest" rather than the "Parliament Shooting Latest" that's in the URL. When the story very first broke, all that was known was that shots had been fired near Parliament -- the press didn't yet know who had fired the shots and why.

Reply

a_pawson March 24 2017, 09:36:02 UTC
Probably because in the UK firearms are used so infrequently. The UK police discharged firearms a total of 6 times in the whole of 2016. Any shooting in the UK is a pretty rare event and likely to attract such a headline.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up