Oct 17, 2014 12:00
training,
education,
germany,
pasta,
genetics,
carbohydrates,
scotland,
society,
women,
phones,
twitter,
tablet,
feminism,
inequality,
economics,
usa,
marriage,
books,
cooking,
billgates,
wildlife,
links,
history,
drugs,
ohforfuckssake,
technology,
uk,
funny,
data,
apple,
communication,
facebook,
labour,
intelligence,
green,
marijuana,
legalisation,
warrenellis,
relationships,
apprentices,
gender,
sms,
names,
food,
lgbt,
privacy,
newyork,
politics
Comments 9
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
I liked the discussion of the election.
Abstain campaign: I think he would do a really good job, but we think the election should have at least one non-white-male candidate.
Candidate: I agree. I'm not sure.
Very civilised...
Reply
Reply
Reply
That is truly bizarre.
Wrt the article on intelligence, I'm deeply unimpressed with the bit "These five findings arose primarily from twin studies." - Given that twin studies (IOW, studies that look at the same 40 or so pairs of separated-at-birth twins who have since learned of one another) are inherently junk for a multitude of reasons, the rest of this seems built on sand.
Reply
Edit: Particularly as the sample sizes they're talking about the genetic tests are in groups ranging from 3,000 to 11,500 people. That's certainly a large enough sample size to be interesting.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I do have some sympathy for people who are mid-way through a degree when they change their legal gender - it's a stressful enough time without having to also negotiate a transfer to a different university.
But the general point still stands.
Reply
Leave a comment