Leave a comment

heron61 October 17 2014, 20:35:01 UTC
Is reheated pasta less fattening?
That is truly bizarre.

Wrt the article on intelligence, I'm deeply unimpressed with the bit "These five findings arose primarily from twin studies." - Given that twin studies (IOW, studies that look at the same 40 or so pairs of separated-at-birth twins who have since learned of one another) are inherently junk for a multitude of reasons, the rest of this seems built on sand.

Reply

andrewducker October 17 2014, 20:38:38 UTC
Twin studies with that low a number of people would indeed be terribly suspect. But if they're actively finding actual genetic correlations and groupings then that's very interesting in its own sake.

Edit: Particularly as the sample sizes they're talking about the genetic tests are in groups ranging from 3,000 to 11,500 people. That's certainly a large enough sample size to be interesting.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

heron61 October 18 2014, 21:58:59 UTC
There are two sorts of studies involving identical twins and both are junk ( ... )

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

heron61 October 18 2014, 22:44:08 UTC
I'm glad my explanation was helpful. It often seems to me that people doing evo psych studies are utterly blind to social and cultural influences and that's part of why they want to find genetic explanations to everything.

As a side-note, here's a fascinating article about how (at least when measured as IQ) intelligence scores can and do change for individuals and that the role genetics plays is likely vastly overstated.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up