Oct 01, 2013 12:00
viafanf,
viaskreidle,
music,
computers,
kickstarter,
language,
web,
genetics,
advertising,
finance,
assault,
3d,
usa,
linux,
advice,
niceness,
france,
petition,
nhs,
sex,
mistakes,
amd,
html5,
children,
links,
history,
ikea,
technology,
uk,
graphics,
bbc,
video,
gmail,
solarpower,
dogs,
jobs,
opensource,
internet,
html,
food,
happiness,
medicine
Leave a comment
Comments 25
Reply
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/requests-341/2-bugs-model-help-89954/
Reply
Reply
I genuinely think it's a huge game changer.
Reply
Now it's (almost)there by itself it should be a runaway process.
Time to glaze over the Sahara!
Reply
Australia probably becomes per capita the most energy rich place in the world. It’s just a shame that the desserts there are so remote they are not even close to the rest of Australia.
Reply
Reply
IIRC we were given a voucher in the hospital along side a bunch of other paperwor which we could hand in at Boots (???) and get the pack full of samples of stuff.
I may not be remembering this at all well as the births of both my children were very long drawn out affairs lasting in total nearly a week and I was pretty close to exhausted at the end of both of them.
Reply
Reply
“Hey employer - here are 500 long term unemployed people, you’ll be paying them the minimum wage for 8 hours a day 5 days a week - better think of something useful to do with them. Sucks to be you.”
It reminds me slightly of the Athenian approach to funding capital items. If they needed a new warship or temple they would pick the richest person in the city who hadn’t paid for something this year and hand them the bill. They could only avoid the bill if they could prove that someone else was richer than them.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I also notice that the various schemes that have been tried for improving the employability of the long term unemployed don’t seem to have great results. Not saying that the better ones aren’t making a difference but they don’t seem to be turning half of the long term unemployed who are on the schemes from unemployed to permanently employed.
I worry that we’ll end up spending quite a lot of money not very effectively trying to get people into employment when the most effective thing we could do would be to get economic growth back up to long term trend and then try some endogenous growth theory ninjistu on the long term growth rate.
Reply
(I need to write a big LJ post about this - but the short version is 25% of the median wage for everyone, remove all income tax brackets, combine NI, and make everyone pay 45% on all income. This gets rid of huge swathes of bureaucracy, relieves all sorts of stress, and makes it much easier for people to move around without worrying about whether there's a job instantly waiting for them.)
Reply
Reply
I recall reading somewhere that one of the reasons that the US was emerging from the slump more slowly than usual was that negative equity and higher levels of home ownership have reduced labour mobility.
Reply
Leave a comment