Leave a comment

Comments 15

momentsmusicaux March 17 2013, 11:26:23 UTC
Why on earth would you even want a github gist to get slurped in like that? LJ has some really odd features sometimes!

Reply

andrewducker March 17 2013, 12:00:26 UTC
I know. Making it an option (with an "unfold" button, or something) would be fine. Automatically expanding my post to be five times the size is not on.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

andrewducker March 17 2013, 11:59:46 UTC
I'm not sure you'd have enjoyed the cat-hoovering aspect.

Reply


bart_calendar March 17 2013, 12:00:21 UTC
I don't see why a $2 million budget is that unrealistic. The average television show costs 1.5 million to make and a movie bases on a TV show is, essentially, one and a half episodes of a TV show. So, the $2 to $3 million range is doable.

Reply

andrewducker March 17 2013, 12:01:23 UTC
Yeah, I figure it'll be a TV movie, not something intended for a mass market, or made using the standard blockbuster techniques.

Reply

bart_calendar March 17 2013, 12:08:00 UTC
Exactly.

Reply

ajr March 17 2013, 22:02:00 UTC
It's a straight-to-DVD movie, effectively, yeah. Probably about 80-100 minutes? So about the length of two TV episodes, more or less. VM was about $1.8m an episode which made it about the cheapest TV show of its type when it was on air, I believe ( ... )

Reply


lil_shepherd March 17 2013, 12:32:36 UTC
I haven't had a look at the Hitler video yet, but my mother grew up in Nazi Germany and I once asked her if she had ever seen Hitler speak, and what that was like. She told me he was impressive when heard in person. (Dad was one of the many British soldiers who met and married a German girl - he was in the Royal Engineers and had an interesting war, but not half as interesting as Mother's.)

Reply

andrewducker March 17 2013, 12:34:33 UTC
It is fascinating to see the difference it makes to see the videos with subtitles I can read.

He goes from Shrieking Madman to Passionate Orator. It's kinda terrifying.

Reply


steer March 17 2013, 15:06:56 UTC
My PhD is maths/stats and that is a great article about the applied side(*). I think it should be referred to whenever someone says something like "if you can't explain it to a 12 year old you don't understand it" or "This wikipedia page on 'cohomology' is quite difficult to read."

(*) The pure maths people are, of course, sometimes horrified that their work might ever be useful outside mathematics.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up