Leave a comment

Comments 6

momentsmusicaux September 11 2012, 11:13:37 UTC
> a two-hour long interactive comedy show, that involved actors impersonating characters from a famous TV comedy.

No prizes for guessing then.

Reply


gwendally September 11 2012, 12:32:19 UTC
Calories of what?

That article didn't say whether the overweight kids were consuming 2000 calories of junk food while the average weight kids were eating 2000 calories with a balanced macronutrient ratio.

Reply

brixtonbrood September 11 2012, 12:38:24 UTC
But it did include an important phrase at the bottom, in the small print: "Self-reported". That doesn't mean it's definitely incorrect, but it does mean that there's a plausible alternative explanation for the data, and one which would explain the difference between younger and older kids as well.

Reply

gwendally September 11 2012, 13:40:07 UTC
LOL, I missed that entirely. Duh. People have known for a million years that obese people routinely underreport their calorie intake and overreport their activity level. I theorize that it's part of why they got obese, simply being bad at judging that stuff.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=self-reported+calorie+intake&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C22&as_sdtp=

That is precisely why it's useful to have a food scale or smaller plates. Portion size is notoriously related to how much you consume if you are an unrestrained eater.

Oh, when I looked at the article itself it says something completely different than the mass-market blurb. It's about when obese kids start lying to themselves.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/09/04/peds.2012-0605

Reply

ice_hesitant September 11 2012, 14:58:34 UTC
Do you dislike the article's inactivity hypothesis?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up