Sep 11, 2012 12:00
art,
business,
education,
society,
freespeech,
law,
wood,
meme,
usa,
pornography,
edinburgh,
weight,
reviews,
links,
geeks,
child_abuse,
technology,
sexism,
uk,
funny,
fringe,
comedy,
browser,
diet,
conventions,
nanotechnology,
maps,
epicstupidity,
ie,
urban,
republicans,
politics
Leave a comment
That article didn't say whether the overweight kids were consuming 2000 calories of junk food while the average weight kids were eating 2000 calories with a balanced macronutrient ratio.
Reply
Reply
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=self-reported+calorie+intake&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C22&as_sdtp=
That is precisely why it's useful to have a food scale or smaller plates. Portion size is notoriously related to how much you consume if you are an unrestrained eater.
Oh, when I looked at the article itself it says something completely different than the mass-market blurb. It's about when obese kids start lying to themselves.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2012/09/04/peds.2012-0605
Reply
Reply
1.) Parents who don't know how to feed THEMSELVES appropriate amounts of nutritious food and therefore couldn't teach their children.
2.) Under-reporting calories.
3.) Increased inactivity due to the discomforts of exercising while fat. The kids just get out of breath faster, their feet hurt faster, they are simply bad at things requiring athletic grace and so it isn't fun.
4.) And, as a result of poor nutrition and poor habits of exercise, having fucked up metabolisms that cause them to hoard adipose tissue.
I read once that obese children have the same hit to their quality of life as children with cancer. That thought has stuck with me as I raise my own children.
Reply
Leave a comment