I know it's a week late, but I figured that I would be remiss in not giving a quick look at the opening pages of Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo's Batman #1, which is being hailed by some as
the very best comic to come out of the DCnU so farMy own reaction: it's good. Not brilliant, but good. It doesn't punch me in the gut, nor does it blow my socks
(
Read more... )
Comments 39
Reply
Reply
I don't actually mind the ending of TDK #1.
Is it supposed to indicate that Harvey's bad side has completely taken over when he became Hulk!Harv?
I think so. But since I can't think of any multiples who have never ever had a time where only one person fronts, I never could understand all the fuss over all-evil Two-Face (like when Dixon or Moench write them). So my over all reaction to this is a resounding "so what?"
Reply
Fuss away! If we're really unlucky, this well-publicized image of Harvey might prove to be so influential that we'll see other artists try aping it down the line! Although it occurs to me, maybe Harvey's one-eye look here is a bit inspired by Lee Bermejo's take in Azzarello's Joker.
As always, I find myself wondering WHY over this issue. Like, why do I still bother with DC? Yes, I've become severely disenchanted with DC over the whole DCnU thing.
It's hard not to be, especially considering what they've been doing to characters like Catwoman.
Did you get a chance to read the whole issue of TDK? I have not been able to yet, although I can't imagine that context will make it much better. It's Jenkins and Finch, after all.
Reply
Didn't Harvey have both his eyes in that story?
I was already becoming disenchanted thanks to 90% of the comics published before DCnU, but that whole crap was the final straw. But especially after Catwoman #1 (it didn't come as a real surprise, and that makes it even worse...). I haven't actually picked up a superhero comic since then. Not even Jekyll & Hyde (even though I really need to get back to work on that review).
I haven't gotten a chance to read it either. I'm completely broke and out of work right now.
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
As for the pink guy, my guess would be the Flamingo. Given that we've also got Professor Pyg, it would make sense - two Morrison villains for the price of one! (Mind you, I'm not sure why he'd be wearing a makeshift cape, but...)Makes sense, although he looks more like a pink Riddler than I recall him looking in Philip Tan's artwork. And considering that one of the Circus of Crime (why the hell didn't you just go for the Red Triangle Circus Gang, Grant Morrison? At least then it would have had precedence and thus wouldn't have looked like a COMPLETELY transparent excuse to have Dick use circus slang) ( ... )
Reply
And yeah, the Red Triangle Circus Gang would have been awesome. Furthermore, that'd introduce the possibility that they'd ditch Pyg and follow the Joker, which is where they should have been to begin eith, in my opinion. (Don't get me wrong; they worked fine with the Penguin, but - they're CIRCUS PERFORMERS. They fit with the Joker like a wave fits sand.)
Reply
Reply
In fact...
Reply
Reply
Is that or is that not about the most physical damage that Squishy's ever been able to do to Batman?
Reply
Reply
Hulked-up Two-Face? Wow. The very concept is like some sort of dumb action figure variant.
The only good thing I see coming from this is if they have him fight Solomon Grundy in this state. While I dislike TLH, I did like the idea of Grundy and Two-Face bonding, and it would be nice to explore that er..."dynamic".
Reply
I liked Gray and Palmiotti's Jonah Hex an awful lot, but not enough to follow religiously. Did you read that beforehand as well, and was there something there which caused you to batten down the hate-hatches?
While I dislike TLH, I did like the idea of Grundy and Two-Face bonding, and it would be nice to explore that er..."dynamic".
Agreed. They barely did, and I wanted to see more.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment