when i read your 'highest level of school completed' answer, i immediately liked you.
then your interests & hobbies lead me to believe that you merely filled out this application as a joke. half-hearted attempts, half-measured responses, perhaps a half-sincere plea to be accepted, but half in jest for insulation, so as not to be vulnerable to the possibility of rejection.
the problem is, even if i embrace your attitude (though i would fear the chance of you being overly inflamitory on a constant basis just to get under everyone's skin- still, i would probably take that chance), it doesn't make up for the vapidity of a lot of your answers.
i like your willingness to be bold, even arrogant (to an extent), but you seem to overly rely on that approach at the expense of substance.
i vote no, but if you decide to re-apply at some point with at least 2-parts substance and a dash of sincerity, you'd have my vote pretty easily.
Re: A few comments.drunkenwandererJanuary 6 2006, 20:44:50 UTC
i won't change my vote; i certainly don't want to start a trend of doing that. but i will say that this made all the difference in the world. would have been an easy yes for me.
Comments 16
I have to admit.. this piqued my curiosity. Peculiar.
Some of your word associations are off-the-wall, and I like that... but why not stick with one word to each word?
Do you know about Salvador Dali's critical-paranoiac method? It can be so much fun
Reply
http://www.answers.com/topic/paranoiac-critical-method
Reply
this has got to be the most difficult vote ever.
when i read your 'highest level of school completed' answer, i immediately liked you.
then your interests & hobbies lead me to believe that you merely filled out this application as a joke. half-hearted attempts, half-measured responses, perhaps a half-sincere plea to be accepted, but half in jest for insulation, so as not to be vulnerable to the possibility of rejection.
the problem is, even if i embrace your attitude (though i would fear the chance of you being overly inflamitory on a constant basis just to get under everyone's skin- still, i would probably take that chance), it doesn't make up for the vapidity of a lot of your answers.
i like your willingness to be bold, even arrogant (to an extent), but you seem to overly rely on that approach at the expense of substance.
i vote no, but if you decide to re-apply at some point with at least 2-parts substance and a dash of sincerity, you'd have my vote pretty easily.
Reply
But, you did come off a bit arrogant in some. But I am willing to give you a shot, because I think you could probably get us talking
Reply
Reply
Reply
good luck.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Leave a comment