hmmmmmmmm

Mar 24, 2010 07:52

Ever single cleaning thing (soap, laundry stuff, furniture cleaning, etc) kills 99.9% of bacteria, if I listen to commercials. Been that way all my life. They still can't get rid of that .1%. Should I be worried?

discuss, from the brain of wr

Leave a comment

Comments 24

lafemmedarla March 24 2010, 12:59:48 UTC
Maybe that .1% is like, healthy bacteria or something?

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:00:19 UTC
I don't think so. They'd tell us then, I think.

Reply

lafemmedarla March 24 2010, 13:06:32 UTC
Could be a conspiracy or something. They have a deal with bacteria to keep away from that certain amount...

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:07:35 UTC
LOL I'm inclined to think it's lying and 99.9 is the most it can get away with. :p

Reply


xindasnocturne March 24 2010, 13:01:16 UTC
*was also going to say possibly healthy or necessary?

Or... not sure >.> *has actually pondered that before*

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:02:17 UTC
I AM NOT ALONE.

Reply

xindasnocturne March 24 2010, 13:04:11 UTC
THAT YOU ARE NOT!

NOW ALL WE NEED IS THE ANSWER...

Reply


lisaquestions March 24 2010, 13:01:17 UTC
Not usually.

In hospitals, though? There's some risk.

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:04:41 UTC
LOL way to turn a joke post serious. :p

Though this reminds me of the dude interviewed by Jon Stewart who talked about giving doctors a checklist of the things to do while doing surgery and stuff (I assume it'd mean proper cleaning techniques). I wonder if that could prevent this stuff from happening some.

Reply

lisaquestions March 24 2010, 13:08:15 UTC
Inorite? I'm terrible. I didn't realize it was a joke post.

There are ways to prevent it, although the basic problem (keeping everything clean and disinfected) is hard to avoid. The alternative is worse, so far.

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:10:17 UTC
Haha it's quite okay. That was really an interesting article so I don't mind.

I think I'm quite in favor of the check list. The part where more doctors said they'd want a doctor treating them to use it more than they were willing to use it themselves sold me on it.

Reply


svelterose March 24 2010, 13:09:13 UTC
Naw, that 99% thing is just a way to cover their asses if someone comes back with a lawsuit saying it didn't kill all the germs because if it did, then their dirty ass kid wouldn't have caught a cold, etc etc.

People are way too lawsuit happy in the US.

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:11:37 UTC
Hm - I'm not actually sure that would happen that often. However, I am sure that people probably internalize the 99.9% and buy. Or would, if every single ad didn't claim it. I'm inclined to blame lazy marketing.

Reply

svelterose March 24 2010, 14:25:55 UTC
Well, my thing on it is that nothing takes care of something else 100%. To claim 100% would open the grounds up for companies to easily discredit you. And yes...if people found a way to sue someone, it would happen quite often. We just don't think it'll happen because we grew up in a 99.99% world, not a 100% world.

I take it as an avoidance to false advertising.

Reply


talymil March 24 2010, 13:15:17 UTC
You see similar things with dandruff shampoo commercials.

Reply

a_white_rain March 24 2010, 13:16:17 UTC
I HAVE .2% OF DANDRUFF LEFT. GIMMIE THE PHONE I'MA COMPLAIN.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up