Sorry about the timing. Too much on my plate at the moment. I completely forgot that I had a summary to do until I saw Chapter 26 on my f-list. So so sorry. *begs for forgiveness*Harry apparates himself and Dumbledore back to Hogsmeade after the adventure in the cave. Harry notices Dumbledore isn't feeling so hot, so he tells Dumbledore that they'
(
Read more... )
Comments 30
Dumbledore muttering in a "strange language" -- hint that Harry will have to learn foreign magic to win? Possible implication of global travel?
So, the way that Dumbledore saw through Harry's invisibility cloak in PS/SS apparently wasn't Legilimency, since Draco can't detect Harry's presence there.
Dumbledore's argument here is pretty feeble. Draco is only anything less than a murderer by accident. The necklace and the poison in the mead were meant to be fatal. If neither Ron nor Kattie had gotten medical attention immediately would they have survived? Probably not. Putting a land mine in front of the wrong house doesn't make it any less deadly. No matter what rationalizations Draco may have chanted to himself, his actions were deadly and his reprieve in each instance is an accident at best ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yeah, I wondered about that, too.
If he knew that Draco was the one spreading havoc in Hogwarts, why didn't DD do something about him sooner? I may be stretching the argument here, but maybe Dumbledore chose to keep Draco around in order to learn (by Legilimency or whatever) more about Voldemort's plans, methods of hiring, current preoccupations, etc - after all, Harry is being blocked out and cannot help him any longer. I know that at this point he has Snape for that, but the more information the better and Snape is also an expert Occlumens. So Dumbledore probably thought that he could manage everything Draco could pull out, and so he kept him around for the sake of information. And then hubris was the cause of his fault. Yeah, I know that now I'm just being mean :)
Reply
Many of Dumble's actions leading up to this merely confused me, but his immobilization of Harry just made me mad. It seemed like a cheap way to play out the whole melodrama "on-camera" and little else. I guess I'm getting sick and tired of the times Harry is forced to play the role of bystander as the plot unfolds around him. Right up until the end, we're left to believe that Dumbledore knows exactly what's "best" for Harry and acts on this knowledge.
Maybe I was just feeling pissy by this time, but I came away feeling as though Harry had been emasculated yet again. Here more than ever I could hear the grinding of the plot mechanisms: we had to get Dumbledore killed, and we had to have Harry unable to act. Meh.
Reply
Reply
Lucky things turned out the way JKR had planned ...
Reply
I guess this is a real limitation of JKR's writing the book from Harry's perspective; since the readers can only see what Harry sees then he had to be present for Dumbledore's death; yet in such a way that "Dumbledore's man" wouldn't affect the outcome. Poor ineffectual Harry!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And laughed. And laughed.
And then realized I was in the car with my family and they were staring at me strangely.
And Dumblegod should've been teaching Harry some better spells, if Severus can deflect them so easily. And the Aurors were casting silly jinxes? The Jelly=Leg Lock? Oh my. And the Death Eaters were casting the freaking Killing Curse.
Reply
Leave a comment