Confusing comments
Off to meet wolfie_sara in a bit.
The other day I posted on the Hounds-L discussion list about Holmes getting a love interest in the film, Christopher Redmond replied (yes the guy who's big on self-promotion in his own books and considers any suggestion of ambiguity concerning Holmes's sexuality as 'pornography') with "Some of us (old, married, but far from blind) would consider this to be GOOD news." -- I don't understand what on earth he means by this comment... anyone? I replied with my stock answer about how Irene Adler's character has become much maligned by a lot of suggestions that after all that protecting herself from an ex-lover she's willing to dump her new husband for a man who spent the last few days trying to trick her.
Anyway...
(remember the rule!)
The other day I posted on the Hounds-L discussion list about Holmes getting a love interest in the film, Christopher Redmond replied (yes the guy who's big on self-promotion in his own books and considers any suggestion of ambiguity concerning Holmes's sexuality as 'pornography') with "Some of us (old, married, but far from blind) would consider this to be GOOD news." -- I don't understand what on earth he means by this comment... anyone? I replied with my stock answer about how Irene Adler's character has become much maligned by a lot of suggestions that after all that protecting herself from an ex-lover she's willing to dump her new husband for a man who spent the last few days trying to trick her.
Anyway...
(remember the rule!)