(Untitled)

Feb 19, 2015 20:12


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 56

yes_justice February 20 2015, 09:49:21 UTC
Comparitively small potatoes, and besides, he'll be getting our hands dirty soon enough.

Reply

madam_shapo February 21 2015, 00:57:23 UTC
That's not the point, but the nonsense that this administration puts out. Don't these people, I am talking particularly about Psaki, Harf, Schultz, Ernest, look like immature morons to you? It's just embarrassing, people make fun of them I've never seen before.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

catlin February 20 2015, 11:35:21 UTC
Agreed...

Reply

hindustar February 20 2015, 14:39:42 UTC
Yep.

Reply

telemann February 20 2015, 17:09:59 UTC
if you knew even the slightest bit of sociology

Haha ;)

Reply


hardblue February 20 2015, 17:35:11 UTC
David Brooks gives a reasoned voice to this perspective.

<<<<<<<<<<<<

The struggle against Islamic extremism has been crippled by a failure of historical awareness and cultural understanding. From the very beginning, we have treated the problem of terrorism through the prism of our own assumptions and our own values. We have solipsistically assumed that people turn to extremism because they can’t get what we want, and fail to realize that they don’t want what we want, but want something they think is higher ( ... )

Reply

telemann February 20 2015, 17:57:43 UTC
That's ironic because I don't see David Brooks as any strong champion of those "pleasures" In fact, he really comes across as a tight-ass.

Reply

hardblue February 20 2015, 18:41:14 UTC
Well, Brooks is a conservative, and conservatives do share some of the elements of the Islamists' critique of Western materialism, even as they enjoy all the wealth and pleasures that the world affords.

Reply

telemann February 20 2015, 19:18:41 UTC
Even on gay marriage, which he supports, he came across condescending with his distinction on how conservatives should justify it (good) versus liberals (bad).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up