Season 2 might not follow DIA?
The other day, Kristin Dos Santos from E! TV (whatever that is) tweeted that she had seen the Season 2 premiere episode and that it's fantastic. Her tweet raises a couple of questions, however, which I'll stick behind a cut.
Given that there is still one very important cast member not yet cast -- Brianna, I have to assume from her tweet that season 2 will not start the same way book 2 does, in 1968, and with Claire retelling what happened to Brianna and Roger, but will continue on from where we left off at the end of season 1. Not a big deal, I guess, but makes me wonder how they'll work in the bits from the start of the book, which are kind of important. They've cast Roger, so obviously those bits will come in at some point -- will they stick them at the end?
Given that there is still one very important cast member not yet cast -- Brianna, I have to assume from her tweet that season 2 will not start the same way book 2 does, in 1968, and with Claire retelling what happened to Brianna and Roger, but will continue on from where we left off at the end of season 1. Not a big deal, I guess, but makes me wonder how they'll work in the bits from the start of the book, which are kind of important. They've cast Roger, so obviously those bits will come in at some point -- will they stick them at the end?