Jun 23, 2006 12:13
Someone brought up the point that this FAQ is a pit; I agree with them pretty much 100%
* Change it to deal *just* with lj-cut
* Move lj user into the "How do I link" FAQ (FAQ 67)
* Nuke lj-poll because that's there just for "completeness" even though we have a poll FAQ
* Move lj-raw into the auto-format FAQ (FAQ 26)
* URL forms, disabling lj-cut ... do these really need to be documented in the FAQ? Does anyone actually ever ask about them? Not really -- let's move them to howto
... How does this sound?
faq67,
faq26,
status-resolved,
cat-entries,
faq75