I can't believe how long it's been since I've posted. I'm never prolific, but I've rarely gone this long without posting since I started on LJ ... and it feels like longer, because it's been such a busy few weeks. The reason, I think, is a combination of extensive travel over the past few weeks (Escapade, which I haven't written about but maybe
(
Read more... )
But also, I really would be interested to know how the writers among you feel about this way of looking at and analyzing writing. I mean, it's fun for me from an analytical perspective, but does thinking about rules "get in the way" of free expression?Er, well if I was planning on writing an academic paper or a high-brow literary book, then fine. If I was still studying English Literature, then yes, I'd think this kind of thing was enjoyable and worthwhile and good. However, I'm writing fanfic. I'm writing for enjoyment, for pleasure, my own (and hey, hopefully other people's), if I started to do this with my writing I'd be waving goodbye to the fun ( ... )
Reply
You can have all of this in a slash story and not have any sex at all. This level of intimacy and throat-catching emotions, depth of attachment, transcendent bond can be achieved without going into actual sex - unless you are including kissing and embracing and sharing intimacy in that way (which for me is far, far more intimate than the actual sex part) in sex.
That's very true, and I found that the story passages I most remembered weren't part of the sex scene at all. I suppose it's because I know they love each other; it's the unexpected, out-of-left-field emotional situations that make the biggest impact on me.
Reply
Reply
See, that's where I disagree. To me that's like saying ... well, like "hugging" is just physical and something they could do with anyone. The point to me is that regardless of whether they could, they aren't having sex with "someone else" - they're having sex with each other, and sure, it's physical, but the very particulars of the physicality - how they react to each other, how they respond, what they do and when and why, not to mention the non-physicals (how they're feeling, etc.) - all of that reveals things about them and, more specifically, about their feelings about and relationship with each other. It's definitely true that a physical action may have little meaning in a vacuum - "Bodie stuck tab A in slot B." But it's the particular action, the context, this particular act of sex with this particular person, this tab A in this slot B in this time and place with these reactions, that makes ( ... )
Reply
I am not dismissing the sex scenes as 'easy' or 'purely about the physical'. I did say 'in many ways' and also 'at one level', that is completely different from saying 'it's purely about the physical. And in many ways sex per se is easy - that is what I was saying. And it is. Sex itself, as the purely physical, is really simple. As you yourself say, it's about sticking Tab A into Slot B ( ... )
Reply
There are many people involved in intimate relationships who, for one reason or another, do not have/are unable to have sex as such, and their relationship is not any the less because of it.Oh, I agree with this entirely - it's all incredibly, incredibly personal and unique; and I didn't mean to imply that lots of animalistic sex is part of any relationship, or that every couple (of whatever sex) expresses ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment