(Untitled)

Aug 19, 2007 14:56

EDIT: The number of these 'gifts' is a bit too large to be a random occurance. Planned attack, anyone?

EDIT 2: Community's back to moderated posting and membership. Don't we all love maturity in opposition?

__________________

Oh, look, free corporate gift spam.

How clever. e_e

*points to userinfo of community*

Leave a comment

Comments 71

aphrodeia August 19 2007, 22:08:56 UTC
Wait, planned ATTACK? Like OH NOES WE R BEING FIREBOMBED BY PICTURES OF PEPSI MAX?

Good lord.

Reply

murdering August 19 2007, 22:10:24 UTC
Attack as in the comments in this, and the gifts. Great how everyone else can use the term of "spam attack" and not get mocked but we're not allowed to. Loving the hypocrisy here.

Reply

aphrodeia August 19 2007, 22:12:29 UTC
I didn't see the spammy comments. Must have missed them.

But the gifts? It's absurd.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


garlicfiend August 19 2007, 22:13:47 UTC
I wouldn't call it a planned attack per se. But stupid_free has a post about the pepsi wank that references a couple of posts on this comm.

The post itself gives no suggestion for spamming y'all with v-gifts, but it gets mentioned a couple times in the comments. So yeah, I'd expect more :\

Reply


blindingrhyme August 19 2007, 22:46:21 UTC
Is it ironic that the folks at stupid_free are pretty much promoting the idea of doing something stupid?

Reply

gotnowhere2b August 19 2007, 22:59:24 UTC
Are you serious?

Reply

blindingrhyme August 19 2007, 23:04:08 UTC
I was referring to the post above mine. It wasn't mentioned in the post itself, just in the comments. And I'm sorry, spamming people with v-gifts is just stupid.

If people want to do it, whatever floats their boats.

A bunch of Pepsi bottles aren't gonna bother me.

But it's still damn stupid.

Reply

theclamsman August 19 2007, 23:09:54 UTC

No. No it's not, since many who make up stupid_free are fucking stupid...or are mentally still in grade school, I can't figure out which.

Reply


serenanna August 19 2007, 22:49:45 UTC
::rubs temples::

Rules of dealing with obvious trolls:

1. Do not feed the trolls. They live just to get you pissed off and cause grief.
2. DO NOT feed the trolls!
3. Ignoring them works better than sporking them back. But laughing at them for being obvious trolls works better.
4. Deleting them works too since their whole existence is to piss you off and make you get stupid too.
5. You can't get even with them or shame them since they'll say anything to piss you off.
6. Sticks and Stones, sticks and stones.

Admin, please. Just boot the troll and be done with it. Whatever she would have to say has no weight anyway if she really cared about the contradictory issues in LJ. This stopped being about totally free speech on 6A's part a few months back anyway.

Reply

serenanna August 19 2007, 22:51:44 UTC
Bah, I mean weeks, not months. ::headdesk::

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

serenanna August 19 2007, 23:03:01 UTC
I didn't form an argument because I figured it would be a waste of my time since you'd obviously find something to keep arguing over until I got sick of it or I screwed up to give you what you want, something to laugh at and feed off of. Thus, you don't feed trolls. I can respect your different opinion and argue against you if you like, or I can just tolerate you and shut up.

If you want to use your right to free speech, then use it by saying it. If you got a grievance with this community that you can prove without causing libel, I would like to hear it.

PS. Thanks for the can. I just love having Pepsi shoved down my throat as the next person. :D

Reply


the_lament August 19 2007, 23:38:20 UTC
No, repetition helps understanding. Although I'm sensing a lost cause with you ;)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up