Comments | communiquills: FRED WEASLEY: 11 May, 1995

greddy_freddy in communiquills

FRED WEASLEY: 11 May, 1995

Nov 06, 2006 20:06

11th May 1995 ( Read more... )

fred_weasley, 1995

Back to all threads

goodasredgold November 13 2006, 16:03:56 UTC

Random late night commenting *g*

I do not believe that that could possibly be anything within school rules, Fred. Who are you hiding it from?

greddy_freddy November 13 2006, 21:03:47 UTC

*raises an eyebrow* Hiding something? Moi?

goodasredgold November 14 2006, 10:22:27 UTC

Please don't tell me that you're going to be spreading whatever it is around the school? We have exams coming up.

greddy_freddy November 14 2006, 20:33:57 UTC

*stows letter in pocket* Alright, Granger, I do very sincerely promise that I won't do anything to interfere with your exams. *grins* I take all educational matters extremely seriously.

goodasredgold November 15 2006, 00:07:24 UTC

*scoffs. grins*
Yes, I'm sure you do.

I am sitting my OWLs this year, Fred.

greddy_freddy November 15 2006, 22:13:32 UTC

*grins wickedly*

And I'm sure you'll outdo yourself in them.

goodasredgold November 16 2006, 10:02:47 UTC

*grins automatically*

I hope so. There is so much to go through, and some of the declentions in Ancient Runes can be very confusing.

greddy_freddy November 16 2006, 21:52:56 UTC

*smirks* Confusing, eh?

Well, I predict a row of Outstandings in your future. *pause* Only you don't like Divination, do you Granger?

goodasredgold November 17 2006, 00:12:26 UTC

Ancient Runes inflects different sylables depending on the gender of the noun. Usually the gender of a noun is clear from its declention. But I always forget that erwita, which means 'army' is neuter because of the 'i,' even though it looks masculine because of the 'er.' If it were masculine, the 'er' would be inflected, but the 'wit' is because it is neuter. In the plural accusative, it is erruta, which is also the singluar genetive of 'stone', enruta.

No, I do like Divination, at all.

greddy_freddy November 17 2006, 17:34:25 UTC

*looks stunned and impressed* That is... that is certainly confusing.

*interestedly* Why not?

goodasredgold November 18 2006, 07:38:59 UTC

*grins*
Yep.

Missing negatives, argh!

It's incredibily imprecise, and relies almost wholely on the skills of the interpreter. It is too easily forged or manipulated. And wanting to know the future is stupid. I don't believe there's any such thing as a genuine prophecy. And in all the stories about them, knowing what's going to happen never helps.

greddy_freddy November 18 2006, 10:12:12 UTC

*teasing* Best leave the rune-work to geniuses like you then.

Yeah, knowing what's going to happen take out all the fun.

goodasredgold November 19 2006, 00:28:15 UTC

*knows that he's teasing and tries not to grin at 'genius'*

That might be the point. I know about your idea of fun.

greddy_freddy November 19 2006, 00:56:49 UTC

*eyebrows raise, grinning* Oh, you do, do you?

What, pray tell, is my idea of fun?

goodasredgold November 21 2006, 11:29:37 UTC

*if her arms aren't crossed, she's crossing them, otherwise she's recrossing them*

Bribing first years to test your products, generally disrupting classes and distracting people from the things they should be doing. Blowing things up.

greddy_freddy November 21 2006, 20:48:01 UTC

*grins* That sounds about right. And those first-years aren't bribed - they're willing volunteers.

Back to all threads