CN strike and back to work legislation

Feb 24, 2007 22:20

I don't think any of you need a link to this. I've been thinknig about this for a whiel now. It doesn't sit right with me. On the one hand yuo have a group of worker who feel they are being underpaid for thier very important services who are legaly striking wichis one of the few actions an emploee can take to get action on his or her greivances, ( Read more... )

opinion, federal

Leave a comment

binro33 February 25 2007, 04:52:03 UTC
on the other hand you have half the country being held at ransome because they rely on CN for thier goods or services.

If they are that important, then they actually are being underpaid.

That being said, a neutral third party is an ideal solution to this problem.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

binro33 February 25 2007, 16:19:33 UTC
Good point.

Reply

_social_retard_ February 25 2007, 21:36:17 UTC
True, though it is the issue here. Pay and benifits. Often it is the big issue too because if you have an employeer with lots of different workplaces then all those workers can't decide on what they want to improve. One set of workers might feel thier workplace is unsafe, while another set want more breaks ect. Money is allways something everyone wants more of. *shrugs* anyways.

Reply

allhatnocattle February 27 2007, 05:40:55 UTC
No matter what the "issue" is, the bottom line is always money. We go to work for the cheque, not job satisfaction. I mean the RollingStones do it for the love of music, eh?

Reply

_social_retard_ February 27 2007, 07:54:47 UTC
Not 100% true we look for jobs that satisfy us too.

Reply

allhatnocattle March 3 2007, 12:54:28 UTC
Sure. But we're only looking at satisfaction after we can afford to. Bottom line we have to eat. Otherwise volunteerism would be way up.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

_social_retard_ February 27 2007, 18:46:48 UTC
I think the auto industry is a perfect example of when unions get so strong they start to make demands companies can't afford. Though its not the only reason the "big 3" are loosing money. No one wants those trucks and SUVs anymore, they want little fuel efficent cars of asian desgine too. Add into the eqasion that those cars are cheaper to make and therefore cheaper to buy and you get a recepee for the big 3 restructuring or going down.

Reply

_social_retard_ February 25 2007, 21:30:55 UTC
My thoughts exactly. A strike lets an employer and thier clients know just how vital those employees are.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up