Republican pundits, full of butthurt, review the election loss of Mitt Romney to Barack Obama, in an article in Salon below. What strikes me is this:
There is an ugly assumption that people who want the government to provide more human services are, of course, thinking of services for themselves. Really? Really? Did it ever occur to you that some of us Voters For the Dreaded Obama feared cuts to gummint services for the poor, or single mother households, or the disabled, or other demographic groups TO WHICH WE DO NOT BELONG. You know, our neighbors? Those guys that Jesus said we are to love as we love ourselves? What kind of morons assume that everyone would only vote for bigger government if it “gave them more things and stuff?” Who thinks that way?
This chaps my bottom. Am I falling prey to a democratic-leaning Salon writer cherry-picking annoying shocking excerpts from republican commentators? I hope so. I hope these are cherry-picked for their awfulness.
And I know, I know, I get on my rant box about this same thing from time to time. Sorry. But I had to let it out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/conservative_pundit_i_don%e2%80%99t_think_much_of_obama%e2%80%99s_%e2%80%9cus%e2%80%9d/ WEDNESDAY, NOV 7, 2012 4:25 PM UTC
Conservative pundit: “I don’t think much of Obama’s “us”
UPDATED: Right-wing writers survey the wreckage. Now with more bile!
BY ALEX HALPERIN
In Republicans’ first writings about last night’s defeat there was bitterness, doomsaying, defiance and contempt, sure, but also hints at how the party needs to reform if it’s going to compete in 21stcentury America:
Ben Shapiro, Breitbart.com
With Mitt Romney’s projected defeat in the presidential race tonight, Americans are very clearly divided into two camps.
The first camp is those who want a country of unending bailouts, of free giveaways, of government-provided goods and services - a camp of Americans who want to forfeit the future to guarantee ease and comfort in the present. The second camp is those who understand that that world is unsustainable, who recognize that freedom is the only guarantor of the present and the future.
Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post
Before Republicans conclude that they had an insufficiently conservative candidate, they should consider what happened in the Senate - a near wipeout. If the party goes hard right, selecting candidates even less appealing to women, minorities and an increasingly secularized society, it is hard to see how they will improve their standing.
Republicans now will need to develop a strategy for addressing our fiscal problems with only one house of Congress in their possession. They will need to look at what the voters are telling them and who the voters are in the 21st century - fewer marrieds, more secular, more ethnically diverse.
Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
There is not much in this to comfort conservatives. The lessons of Ohio are that Barack Obama is a skillful demagogue, that the ancients were wise to number envy among the deadly sins, and that offering Americans a check is a more fruitful political strategy than offering them the opportunity to take control of and responsibility for their own lives. This is what Oakeshott had in mind when he wrote that liberty was something that many people simply are not equipped to “enjoy as an opportunity rather than suffer as a burden.”
Kathryn Jean-Lopez, National Review
The “war on women” nonsense is among what weighs on me most here. How insulting. And it worked?! As I asked Tuesday morning when Planned Parenthood pointed to girls asking their moms not to forget to vote for the right to abort children: Is this really who we want to be? I don’t believe it is. I think voters went with the devil they know, as it is said, vs. the one they only started to get to know, and not entirely. In the mainstream media, the religious-liberty fight didn’t even ever really get a hearing. Lawsuits? Who knew? We knew? But until the whole nation reads National Review … here we are.
Matt Mackowiak, President, Potomac Strategies Group in Politico Arena
The Obama campaign election win cements into place two more years of the current political environment - divided government.
Obama did not win support for a second term agenda. He essentially has none. While the electoral college will finish with Obama over 300 votes, the popular vote will be very narrow. Obama will have some political capital, but no mandate.
Mark Steyn, National Review
A lot of the telly chatter is about how Republicans don’t get the shifting demographics: America is becoming more of a “brown country,” as Kirsten Powers put it on Fox. But New Hampshire is overwhelmingly white - and the GOP still blew it. The fact is a lot of pasty, Caucasian, non-immigrant Americans have also “shifted,” and are very comfortable with Big Government, entitlements, micro-regulation, Obamacare and all the rest - and not much concerned with how or if it’s paid for.
If this is the way America wants to go off the cliff, so be it. But I wish we’d at least had a Big Picture election. The motto of the British SAS is “Who dares wins.” The Republicans chose a different path. A play-it-safe don’t-frighten-the-horses strategy may have had a certain logic, but it’s unworthy of the times.
Erick Erickson, Red State
The question we are going to have to assess is whether Barack Obama’s coalition is a Democratic coalition or a Barack Obama coalition. My personal opinion is that Barack Obama built a winning coalition for Barack Obama and it may not translate to a long term Democratic coalition. …
The Obama campaign ran a very good campaign. The Republicans did not. There was no fraud. There was no stealing the election. There was just a really good ground game from Barack Obama and a lot of smoke and mirrors from Team Romney and outside charlatans, many of whom will now go work for Republican Super PACs making six figure salaries, further draining the pockets of rich Republicans when not on television explaining how awesome and expert they are. Whether you can bring yourself to say it or not, like it or not, Barack Obama is, today, your President.
Hugh Hewitt, HughHewitt.com
Will stagflation come? Almost certainly yes, and the brutal reality of the fiscal hole the president dug will descend, and rather quickly. Will healthcare rationing arrive in the form of the IPAB? Yes, and seniors and their families will be shocked by the consequences. Will there be a crisis of confidence in our debt, and another panic? I hope not but rational people have to assume so.
My biggest worry is four more years of starving our military, and here the House must simply say no, even if it forces the showdown that the GOP strove so hard to avoid for fear that it would wreck their political chances. It is the Speaker’s and Leader McConnell’s first duty to make sure the military gets what it must have.
Pray for the president and the Congress and yes, with special zeal, for the health of the Supreme Court. We are in uncharted waters, but the Framers were geniuses, and we will see if that wisdom surpassed even what we had previously appreciated.
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform, in National Review
The Republican House was reelected after not just touching but fondling the “third rail of American politics.” It is clear that if you are specific about your reforms they cannot as easily be misrepresented to voters. The Republicans in the House all voted for Ryan. They lashed themselves to the mast and thrived. Romney hinted he was sort of in that general vicinity. One party has a plan that has been tested successfully in the fires of an election. The other party cannot even write a budget that wins a single Democrat vote.
Onward.
Maggie Gallagher, National Organization for Marriage, in National Review
The Obama electorate defeated marriage. I’m guessing we lose at least three of tonight’s four races, and maybe four of the four. We were outspent eight-to-one - and no one was willing to speak for marriage, while the whole Democratic establishment and Hollywood campaigned for marriage. Last night really is a big loss, no way to spin it.
Matt Lewis, the Daily Caller
After all, Americans should have been outraged by what happened in Benghazi. Americans should have been outraged by the increasing debt - and by the fact that the unemployment rate actually rose during Obama’s first term.
But it is the job of politicians and parties and movements to persuade Americans to buy into their vision. And they clearly aren’t buying what Republicans are selling. It’s time for the GOP to do some serious soul searching.
This is not to say that Obama and Democrats have earned some huge mandate. They haven’t. The country is still polarized, and government is still divided. Obama’s team ran a very good campaign. All of these things are true. But these factors should not provide an excuse for the GOP to once again postpone taking a long, hard look in the mirror.
Jay Nordlinger, National Review
“Mitt Romney: Not one of us.” That was the slogan of an Obama ad. And, yes, Mitt Romney is not one of us. Who’s “us”? Whoever we are, or they are, Romney isn’t one of them. And I’m not either. Fine with me, in a way. I don’t think much of Obama’s “us.”
I’m very sorry that Obama has won again, because I think he’s a bad president, and I’ve also come to think very little of him as a man. But even more, probably, I’m sorry that Mitt Romney won’t be president. I think he would have been an excellent one. I think he would have shored up the country, reestablished us - but the people have spoken.
… Well, we can try to persuade. Keep making our case. Alternatively, the pain of economic decline might wake people up. Or not. Gerald Ford liked to say, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.” I think the American people - the new American people - are saying, “Yeah, so?”
…
Outside my window now, they’re whooping it up, just like four years ago. This is the sound of the American people. The modern “yawp.” Obama promised that he would “fundamentally transform” the country. And lo . . .
I will say once more: We chose it. Or somebody did - the “us” that Mitt Romney is not one of, and that I’m not one of either (glad to say). How about you? Feeling all ussy?
Philip Klein, Washington Examiner
But in a larger sense, Obama did not win an ideological victory yesterday. He did not get reelected in a landslide like Ronald Reagan in 1984. Instead, he scored an Electoral College victory and what looks like a narrow popular vote win by employing the same sort of tactics he once decried. Karl Rove may be a big loser tonight, but his brand of politics is here to stay.
Howie Carr, Boston Herald
For the first 37 years of her life, [Elizabeth Warren] was white, and going nowhere. Then she decided to begin checking the box, and within nine years she’d scored two Ivy League law professorships. And then she became white again - “Okie to her toes,” as she put it.
Phony to her toes is more like it.