The thing with Wikipedia that amazes me is the quantity of information that's available. Type in, say "Saudi Arabia" and a flood of facts is instantly available that's nearly always accurate. Of course, they do need to be cross-checked, but I find they're usually precise enough to give me a solid overview of any subject.
For instance.... If I click here, I'll definitely find out more information than if I simply surfed to the city's Chamber of Commerce. (Check out the first Point of Interest!)
Couldn't tell you how accurate the info on the page is, but I'd be willing to bet it's more than enough for me. :)
Thank you [bowing to audience]. Thank you.helenabucketAugust 4 2006, 20:04:09 UTC
and a flood of facts is instantly available that's nearly always accurate.
I always read the discussion page to see what's in dispute. It's a helpful way to gauge the accuracy of an article.
For instance.... If I click here, I'll definitely find out more information than if I simply surfed to the city's Chamber of Commerce. (Check out the first Point of Interest!)
I would, indeed! It's thick and chewy, but not hard to unpack (IMO) once you get a handle on his style and use of examples -- not to mention still quite, quite relevant to our modern times. Paranoia in politics will never go out of style, I think, and he's the top expert as far as I know.
Comments 13
--猫子
Reply
Reply
Reply
The thing with Wikipedia that amazes me is the quantity of information that's available. Type in, say "Saudi Arabia" and a flood of facts is instantly available that's nearly always accurate. Of course, they do need to be cross-checked, but I find they're usually precise enough to give me a solid overview of any subject.
For instance.... If I click here, I'll definitely find out more information than if I simply surfed to the city's Chamber of Commerce. (Check out the first Point of Interest!)
Couldn't tell you how accurate the info on the page is, but I'd be willing to bet it's more than enough for me. :)
Reply
I always read the discussion page to see what's in dispute. It's a helpful way to gauge the accuracy of an article.
For instance.... If I click here, I'll definitely find out more information than if I simply surfed to the city's Chamber of Commerce. (Check out the first Point of Interest!)
Guess WHO added that point of interest. ;-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment