GOT SIMS 3
It's interesting. EA apparently decided to take out a third of the content and put it in the online store so you have to pay more money for it. That is a stupid stupid idea and I'm not paying more money for something I should already have, and thankfully
modders agree. Hahahaha I can't believe they thought this would work
(
Read more... )
Comments 32
edit: and I say this as someone who worked for videogame retail stores for three years and saw it alllllll the time
Reply
but eh effort, eh ugly faces too!
Reply
i don't know what they expected the mod comunity to do other than steal everything
Reply
I approve of being able to choose shoes though, skin tones and make proper looking fat people (and muscly people)
And the trait system COULD be kinda interesting.
And lifelong aspirations are cute!
UMM
BUT MY PEOPLE HAVING LIVES OF THEIR OWN DISTURBS ME. ON MANY LEVELS. Hmm!
This is going to be a decision that takes days. Make more posts! (EA stop being jerks)
Reply
THE INDEPENDENT NEIGHBORHOOD BOTHERS ME, BUT I HAVEN'T EXPLORED IT ALL FULLY YET
Reply
IN OTHER HILLARIOUS NEWS. IE 8 and Firefox aren't supported by their computer checker thing. Eitehr that or Spybot is blocking it. WAY TO NOT ENTICE ME TO BUY YOUR GAME GUYS.
Reply
haha I WOULDN'T BUY THE ONLINE ONE ANYWAY i heard it's got that nasty copyprotection on it
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yeah, I was kind of disappointed by how limited the customization is, in terms of hair and such. I was pleasantly surprised that you can customize specific colors on parts of an outfit now, though! Now all it needs is more accessories or something, IDK.
I do however agree that making everything else pay-only is a dick move. EA what the fuck, don't pull that on us!
Reply
And yeah I expected more hair. Or at least the same hair from Sims 2. It couldn't be that hard to port, right? Although the color customization is very cool.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment