Blogspot Z: Picturesque Padalecki - What Went Wrong?

Aug 02, 2008 23:00

Blogspot Z: The Last Place to Go for News

Why am I having Padalecki thoughts? Not in a gross way, mind you, but I was thinking about Friday the 13th earlier (random! I know!) and then I saw his DVD Christmas movie cover and my brain's been infested.

Ramblings on Padalecki's Up-Coming Cinematic Achievements )

ramble, blogspot z

Leave a comment

Comments 16

astrothsknot August 3 2008, 10:47:36 UTC
I now have the Smurfs tune stuck in my head. Thanks

Reply

zannes August 4 2008, 02:41:28 UTC
You are welcome. Mozart only wished he'd composed it.

Reply


ex_nonniemou154 August 3 2008, 13:01:36 UTC
Isn't that movie about Thomas Kincaid or somesuch nonsense? If so, then the Padalecki sex appeal and hot must be toned down for the gentle sensibilities of the masses who are expected to purchase this ... thing. My guess would be that's what the goal was, to play up "sweetness and light" in a "Seventh Heaven" fashion. Not that they succeeded, but...

Urgh. Sorry, the whole idea of this movie makes me nauseous. Not even for Jared will I buy anything remotely related to Thomas Kincaide. Nope.

Reply

zannes August 4 2008, 02:44:17 UTC
They beat the Padalecki sex appeal into submission and castrated it with nail clippers before burning it into ashes. It's just...awful. I have never seen him look more fake in a photo before.

Reply


roseincognitus August 3 2008, 20:09:36 UTC
Lmfao!! Darwin is SUCH a whore. And come on, who wouldn't like to carve a Padalecki notch in their bedpost?
I'm with you on the whole horror movie thing in general. I always find myself rolling my eyes and asking the characters on screen about their general intelligence. Who the hell knowingly puts themselves in danger? You know I'd be right behind you going "FASTER dude - we only need to outrun the idiots."
Although I probably would try to save the Padalecki if need be. Not that HE'D need it, but still. It'd be nice to try. A grateful Padalecki would be potentially ... yummy.
As to the picture - maybe they were trying to make him look less overwhelmingly sexual and more sweet and aw garsh? His eyes are pretty. That's about all I got.

Reply

zannes August 4 2008, 02:46:48 UTC
They can make him look less overwhelmingly sexual without making him look like...that. I even made my own version and I think it's better than their version, even with the crappy photoshop.

Reply


turapele August 3 2008, 20:52:11 UTC
Yep, agreed. There is a hairdresser/stylist who wants to take cover right now. They've made him look like he's trying out for the Osmonds.
Its cheesy and dated and, if it ends up for sale in the UK, he won't have to worry about out running mass murders but rather out running my mum and her mob of randy old women.

Reply

zannes August 4 2008, 02:48:05 UTC
Hhmmm, maybe that's the point. He's supposed to look like Donny Osmond. Even more horrifying!

Reply


brigid_tanner August 3 2008, 21:05:15 UTC
I just delighted that I don't have to go to a theater to see this. I hate the idea of the movie, but for Jared, I'll watch it. I'll also be fast forwarding through any scenes he's not in. It's kind of a cute picture, but he looks so young! I think nonniemous is right...they can't show how sexy he really is. Your picture from Comic Con was MUCH better :)

Not that I won't buy it and have him sign it at LA Con. 'Cause I'm all about him facing up to his artistic choices. Heh. You made him sign "New York Minute", too, didn't you? LOL!!

Reply

zannes August 4 2008, 02:51:17 UTC
I'll admit I'm grateful I don't have to put on my hat and fake beard to go see this. Even I have my limits. But I would've done it for The Padalecki.

Yes! I did and it's an illegible scrawl that no one can read. *sigh* So I'm not sure I can convince people I didn't just doodle on it accidentally.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up