Leave a comment

Comments 13

(The comment has been removed)

zandperl December 26 2007, 22:17:18 UTC
Because, clearly, male politicians are not allowed to take their kids to the doctor. Or their wives in labor either.

Reply


ayashi December 26 2007, 21:41:45 UTC
lol, gotta say I have never seen a woman in a police uniform that is only 100 pounds! (unless she is in a movie or... a stripper... in a movie!)

As for the rest of it... wow. As much as it isn't really hard to believe, it is hard to believe that people still think like that.

Reply

zandperl December 26 2007, 22:14:58 UTC
Yeah, what surprised me was that people are still willing to *say* it, and in a public setting too.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

zandperl December 26 2007, 22:15:39 UTC
I wasn't aware of his vaccination addiction. Sheds new light on his anti-stem cell research attitude.

Reply


hrafn December 27 2007, 00:37:55 UTC
What a fucking asshole. Family and Medical Leave and Act, dipshit! Hello!

Reply

zandperl December 27 2007, 00:45:36 UTC
He apparently would be of the opinion that the FMLA is a travesty of justice.

I have had centrist friends play Devil's Advocate with me and argue that a drawback of having a woman president is the possibility of mood swings associated with their menstrual cycle. I am pretty sure those individuals believe there are a similar number of positives that come with a potential woman president, but ... Well, at least at age 60 Hillary's probably into menopause so that's even less a valid argument against her. :-P

Reply

hrafn December 27 2007, 01:47:41 UTC
Because men /never/ have mood swings. Right. Ow I strained my eyes rolling them.

Reply


l0stmyrel1g10n December 27 2007, 03:01:02 UTC
IF I IMAGINE HARD ENOUGH THAT IT DOESN'T EXIST, MAYBE IT WILL GO AWAY

IS IT GONE YET?

damn. it's still here. i tell you, the idiocy is painful!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up