Leave a comment

Comments 101

gravity_splode May 19 2009, 22:19:35 UTC
Only if you round the answer up. Otherwise you're left with 0.829 as an answer.

Reply

[Voice forever] yoctograms May 19 2009, 22:20:28 UTC
Zetta duh.

Reply

[Voice] gravity_splode May 19 2009, 22:21:22 UTC
Juuuuust saying.

Reply

[Voice] yoctograms May 19 2009, 22:23:32 UTC
Some Old Horses Can Always Hear Their Owner Approach

Reply


[Voice] crownwielding May 19 2009, 22:57:29 UTC
[ there's the sound of pencil scratching on paper and then- ]

Isn't the answer seven?

[ ... nope Sora was never good with math. ]

Reply

1/3 yoctograms May 19 2009, 22:59:26 UTC
[WHAT THE HELL THAT ANSWER IS SO FUCKING STUPID IT--]

Reply

2/3 yoctograms May 19 2009, 22:59:55 UTC
[...Wait isn't that the Composer's partner? It sounds different though...]

Reply

[Voice forever] yoctograms May 19 2009, 23:00:42 UTC
[Megaphone time]

AND INVERSE MATRIX?!

Reply


[Voice] a_childish_lord May 19 2009, 23:31:44 UTC
[A looong silence]

...How do you do that??

Reply

[Voice] yoctograms May 20 2009, 01:50:01 UTC
So zetta slow!

Reply

[Voice] a_childish_lord May 20 2009, 01:50:38 UTC
Zetta..slow? Hey! I'm not slow!

Reply

[Voice] yoctograms May 20 2009, 02:13:33 UTC
You factoring hectopascal that is a z-level problem!

Reply


[Voice] ratatosk_knight May 20 2009, 03:38:49 UTC
Um... I'm afraid I'm not very good at math.

Reply

[Voice] yoctograms May 20 2009, 04:17:46 UTC
You radian that is a z-level problem!

Reply

[Voice] ratatosk_knight May 20 2009, 04:20:35 UTC
Is that a bad thing?

Reply

[Voice] yoctograms May 20 2009, 04:30:10 UTC
What the factor is taking you so long you hectopascal?! A half-retarded rhombus could solve that in t = 30.00s !

Reply


Voice whiporkindness May 20 2009, 22:07:27 UTC
No...it's .826.

Reply

Voice yoctograms May 20 2009, 22:10:19 UTC
= New hypothesis

Reply

Voice whiporkindness May 20 2009, 22:13:56 UTC
What was your original hypothesis?

Reply

Voice yoctograms May 20 2009, 22:15:26 UTC
± incorrect

Reply


Leave a comment

Up