Fresh from BoingBoing

Dec 05, 2008 17:54

The rich man's stick insect, better known as the various leaf-mimicking arthropods and frogs, have adapted to their natural leaf and leaf-litter habitats in a really awesome way. Their exoskeletons - or skin, for the frogs - resemble fresh, fallen, and dead leaves, winning them the gold medal in the Camouflage Olympics.

Original article is HERE. ( Read more... )

frog, arthropod, invertebrate, insect, mimicry, lepidoptera, preying mantis, flying insect, katydid

Leave a comment

Comments 45

icelore December 6 2008, 07:43:15 UTC
I adore the butterfly!

And wtf is the 'Silent Hill shark'? o.0

Thanks for posting!

Reply

trompelol December 6 2008, 07:47:57 UTC

(The comment has been removed)

trompelol December 6 2008, 10:50:41 UTC
I have to admit the first time I saw the picture I linked to I screamed, but it is really cool from up front and adorable in profile. It's face is permanently ":D"

Reply


logansrogue December 6 2008, 10:07:36 UTC
That last insect is CRAZY.

Reply


mushroom_maiden December 6 2008, 11:12:10 UTC
That is AMAZING. I wonder how they do that? How does this come about? The evolution of it baffles me. Colours to match environment, sure, but looking THAT MUCH EXACTLY LIKE A LEAF? Do they have cameras in their DNA or what?

Reply

emojoe December 6 2008, 13:04:46 UTC
Same old evolution that gave us opposable thumbs and gave giraffes long necks. It developed slowly, and the ones who (accidentally) looked more like leaves survived and had kids who looked like leaves, some of whom would slightly improve on it (accidentaly/incidentally).

Reply

thetragicreturn December 6 2008, 17:55:32 UTC
Oohhhh, now it makes more sense. But, man, that must be one LONG evolutionary development. o_o

Reply

mushroom_maiden December 7 2008, 04:05:13 UTC
that's amaaaaazing. I love the world!

Reply


sarig December 6 2008, 13:19:05 UTC
Great photos!

The articles constant use of "evolution adaptation" baffled me somewhat though.

Reply

ladybuggington December 6 2008, 15:01:17 UTC
If you read the comments to the article on that page, it's because there was a debate about the proper usage of the term evolution. So apparently the writer did that to appease people.

Reply

sarig December 6 2008, 15:04:03 UTC
Cheers for pointing that out :)

Reply


ialmrnt5 December 6 2008, 14:08:41 UTC
whats the silent hill shark?

Reply

maeda December 6 2008, 15:10:50 UTC
I was trying to come up with something witty or at least find a picture, but I've got nothin'.

Reply

trompelol December 6 2008, 17:29:17 UTC

Leave a comment

Up