(Untitled)

Aug 22, 2009 23:38

Fanfic rant - Why the hell would you automatically increase the rating cause it might possibly contain Teh Gheys? This is annoying and, I know that you, the fucktard authors, don't care, but dude, srsly, I'm not going to read you if you think a fic is deserving of a higher rating cause it contains a homosexual relationship ( Read more... )

rambling, random, personal, rant

Leave a comment

Comments 9

(The comment has been removed)

wook77 August 26 2009, 05:07:30 UTC
I just do not see the need for the warning. Like, today, in a SLASH comm, someone warned for "m/m slash. Don't like, don't read". Um, you're in a slash comm. Is that really necessary?

I'm really disillusioned too. I've seen some brilliant independent movies and I keep wondering why the big producers don't pick the more creative stuff coming from the independent movies. I'm slowly turning into one of those "stop raping my childhood to get another dollar out of it" people.

I'm cool with some of them but the Clash of the Titans ones has me sort of boggled. Sure, the special effects haven't held up, but, the little metal owl totally makes it because he's so clunky.

Not everything needs CGI, dammit. A lesson George Lucas could stand to learn.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

wook77 August 26 2009, 05:56:37 UTC
I've been to the cinema multiple times but they haven't been all that great of movies, tbh. I liked them but they're nothing that I'd write home about.

HOMG the Karate Kid thing and, of course, his son would be the starring role. *facepalm*

Reply


thistlerose August 23 2009, 17:48:15 UTC
Fanfic rant - Why the hell would you automatically increase the rating cause it might possibly contain Teh Gheys?

Ugh, I hate when people do that. I won't read a fic by an author who does that, or by an author who warns for m/m or f/f. Argh, people.

I don't mind remakes so much when the director has something genuinely new to say about the source material. But most of the time it just seems as if: 1) they can't think of anything better to do and 2) they just want to add sex and slick special effects. Meh.

Reply

wook77 August 26 2009, 05:10:17 UTC
Seriously. Same. Today in the one slash comm, someone warned for slash and then said "don't like, don't read". um, dude, you're posting in a slash comm. We're all aware that it contains slash.

Definitely on the CGI thing, especially (yes, George Lucas, I'm looking at you). There is no need to clean up a lot of this stuff. There really isn't. The fact that they're clunky sort of makes the movie at times.

I think point 3 is - they want to milk more money from it.

Reply


starlitshore August 24 2009, 02:38:04 UTC
I am also distressed about the lack of originality in art/media these days. EVERYTHING is being remade. That's all that's out there. WHY WORLD WHY?

Reply

wook77 August 26 2009, 05:14:25 UTC
Oh man, me too. Just, srsly, Hollywood is supposed to be so creative. Where is that creativity!?

Also also - HOMG WELCOME BACK YOU HAVE BEEN MISSED!

Reply

starlitshore August 26 2009, 13:55:50 UTC
It's stuck in some starving writer's desk drawer while they work 9-5. D: Also I just found out that they're remaking Hallowe'en II. *weeps*

HI! THANKS! <3 I missed you, too! Summer was dumb. Haha.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up