2006 AL Power Ranking, Pre-ST version
1. White Sox I was not a believer last year, but the improvements they've made to a WS champ are unbelievable. Major weaknesses include holes in the lineup at 3B and SS, injury risks at the power positions DH and RF. Major strengths include offensive depth (Mackowiak was a huge, and underrated, acquisition,
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's "Pronk" Hafner. Not "Plonk." It stands for "part project, part donkey." Also, the Indians signed Perez to platoon with Broussard, so the lefty issue is diminished. Plus, even though, as you point out, they lost Millwood (and Elarton and, more painful, Howry), they did do a pretty decent job replacing them. I've always rather liked Jason Johnson, and I think Byrd will be this year's Millwood. Interesting e-newsletter here from my favorite Cleveland sportswriter about the Crisp trade.
I need to start studying. I canNOT finish last in my own damn league again!
Reply
I think Wickman's time is running out; I didn't like that signing much. I've always liked Byrd, and he did finally complete a season last year; I've unconsciously had him in my "recovering from injury" bin since that season he missed between the Royals and Braves, what was that, 2002?
Thanks for the correction on Hafner... I guess it doesn't pay to try to show off your insider knowledge of other teams when you screw it up, eh?
Reply
I believe Byrd missed parts of '03 and '04, but I could be wrong - I'm going off the top of my head, and I know it was more recent than '02. But, of late, the Indians have done a pretty good job of taking pitchers that other teams were afraid of because of recent injury, signing them cheap, and doing very well with them. Millwood and Howry most notably, but they've done this a couple years running.
Reply
Actually it might be for the best, I might have dropped him before the ASB if I had drafted him, and then I'd feel worse. Like I did the year before with JOHAN FREAKIN SANTANA! Argh!
Reply
You're crazy.
(although I'm liking their chances at having a pretty decent rotation...)
I agree with mostly everything else though. I think I'd probably put the Sox (Red ones) at number 2 though. I could never trust kids. And both teams have too many. Oakland had a great rotation last year, but I want to see it two years in a row before I believe it. And Cleveland had an awful start and finish to last year...they need a little more consistancy (and another starter or two) to be among the AL's elite. I do think they're making the play offs though.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
And that second site lists him at 53/54 in k/bb, which is not good for himself, but not too shabby in the real world, right?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment