Hey there, fabulous flist!
Just a reminder to please take a few minutes to fill out the [
AUDIOFIC SURVEY ] if you haven't yet. It's open through Saturday. Whatever fandom, however you participate, we want to hear from you! We've got 185 responses so far, but it'd be super-cool if we could get 200
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Don't you love being able to combine library school and fandom? It's fun.
Reply
This is my first time I've done the fandom / library school crossover. But it is definitely fun! And we haven't even registered yet, but I'm already plotting another crossover project for next term! (I really want to take the Communities of Practice class.) :D
Reply
I need to look and see what's being offered. I need to take management but other than that I've got no major plans for spring. I think they're offering the advance children's seminar which I'd LOVE to take but I haven't taken the regular children's lit. Not that I think I really need to take the regular one to be able to cope with the advanced.
Reply
I'm in the children's lit seminar now and it is fabulous! It's the same professor in the spring advanced class, so I'm sure it will be equally awesome. I would love to take that, too, but I don't know if I can justify it since I don't plan to be a children's librarian.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
See, we couldn't decide either, so we put it to the vote to make other people decide for us. :P
Reply
I can see why, for a pan-fandom archive, you'd want something standard that didn't require you to go with fandom custom each time, especially since there might be warring factions of nomenclature within a fandom, or you might have an SGA situation where it's John Sheppard/Rodney McKay, but Rodney McKay/John Sheppard (which duh, you are aware of, but I like using the bold command).
Of course, any kind of labeling requirement/practice raises the issue of compelled speech, and whether by having a standardized system you force people into a particular kind of expression that's distinct from or even in opposition to their chosen speech. (Say, if a person podficcing a John/Elizabeth story really felt it was important to say the pairing was "Sparky ( ... )
Reply
So, to finally reply to a bit of what you blathered on waxed poetical about, it certainly is not our intention to limit the ways in which people can label their pairings. Nor do I think we'll actually have that effect, since podfics are a secondary version of a story. The pairing labels and such are transferred over from the fanfic and, as far as I know, there is no one attempting a similar thing with fanfics. (Oh, wait, except the Archive of Our Own, which seems to have no rules for pairing names yet.) I know there are weird pairing name rules, but we're aiming for consistency. Within one fandom, as you point out, there are different ways to write a pairing (J/R vs. M/S (though curiously both are alphabetical!)). With a multi-fandom archive, though, there are many (many many many!!) fandoms we know nothing about besides what is given in the header for the text fics, so if those are inconsistent, we have no way of knowing what's the ( ... )
Reply
Bwahahhaaa that amuses me.
Reply
Thankfully it amuses general_jinjur, too. :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment