what constitutes respect and compromise?

Oct 20, 2010 10:06

Lowering a veil on men's right to see justice being delivered is a somewhat poorly written but interesting article written by the the Herald Sun's Andrew Bolt today ( Read more... )

politics, religion, mid

Leave a comment

Comments 11

sars October 20 2010, 06:36:44 UTC
I've not read articles by Andrew Bolt before (that I can remember), but it didn't seem too provocative.

As for the scenarios he listed, I agree with the judges ruling to ask male journalists to leave. The journalists being there or not have no bearing on the case being tried so I don't have a problem with that. However he probably should have asked all journalists to remove themselves so as not to discriminate.

However community festival organisers asking for a dress code? That's just ridiculous. We lived in Broadmeadows for nearly 10 years and went to the Ramadan festival many times and no one cared one way or another what you wore. In fact some of the Muslim girls who lived around Broady would go out wearing mini-skirts and little midriff tops with their head scarves on.

Really, it comes down to the fact that they chose to come and live in this country and they should respect our culture just as much as we should respect theirs.

Reply

whochick October 20 2010, 20:47:49 UTC
I know what you mean, and yet I find it so hard to find language to express the concept of having a little cultural/religious give and take in the way we interact. It seems to always sink towards a feeling of assimilation rather than integration or acceptance.

I found the festival/pool scenario made me think twice. I'm really not sure if I'm comfortable with anyone being dictated to regarding their swimming attire. Just as I wouldn't want Muslims to be forced to wear bikinis, I'm not sure non-Muslims should have to cover up at an Aussie swimming pool.

Unless you're forcing a situation on someone (like in the courtroom) we should all of us, regardless of our religious/cultural mores, be allowed dress as we see fit. The girl on the witness stand feels like a different set of circumstances to the others outlined in the article.

Ah, here you go - each to their own; I think that's the closest I'll get!

Reply


kateorman October 20 2010, 09:11:24 UTC
They seem like reasonable, common-sense compromises, worked out case-by-case. Which must be galling for folks like Bolt who want Muslims and non-Muslims to be at each others' throats. (My own attitude is one of civil indifference. :)

Reply

whochick October 20 2010, 20:50:30 UTC
I'm all for civil indifference, but does that extend to instances where people are dictated to in public settings, e.g. the swimming pool?

Just as I wouldn't want to force a Muslim to uncover, I wouldn't want to force an Aussie to cover up.

It's questions such as those that pull me down from my perch of live and let live, because any kind of dictatory policy annoys me ;)

Reply

kateorman October 20 2010, 22:47:34 UTC
At the pool, we're obliged to cover our breasts and genitals all year round. I think we could probably cope with covering our knees and shoulders as well for two hours on a single evening. :)

Although I think the pool at our gym should institute a new dress rule whereby some of the men are obliged to wear paper bags over their heads.

Reply

whochick October 21 2010, 05:25:16 UTC
LOLOLOL forever. Heh, I needed that. You, my dear, are frankly hilarious.

And right.

Reply


infiniteviking October 20 2010, 16:07:55 UTC
Hmmmm. Always a good question -- where to judge when one group's religious freedom infringes on another's ( ... )

Reply

whochick October 20 2010, 20:52:43 UTC
I know, I know, compared to other countries we're not quite as blatant in our Muslim vs. Everyone media stance (thank goodness!), but reading articles like Bolt's do upset me. I think it's mostly because we're focusing on how we're 'other' rather than what brings us together and unites us.

I have Muslim friends who are so proud of being Australian, just as proud, if not more, than they are of following Islam. Some wear a veil, some don't. I just think that the minute we start dictating to people about things as personal as a dress code ... well, it's a little Orwellian, isn't it?

Reply

infiniteviking October 20 2010, 21:28:45 UTC
I think it's mostly because we're focusing on how we're 'other' rather than what brings us together and unites us.

Definitely a better way to look at the issue. B|

(In re media stances, I was referring to overall party politics -- the opposition and anyone who agrees with them is evil and bad for humanity and we know this because they're stupid and we don't like them, and they smell bad too; THINK OF THE CHILDREN! -- as well as the fear-mongering that comes up whenever a group has a chance to unite by creating a common enemy out of another group, religious or otherwise. There's waaay too much of that here and it drives me up the freaking wall.)

In other words, what you said.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up