Leave a comment

Comments 44

mewiet August 1 2011, 21:35:32 UTC
I'm already intrigued by the title of this episode. I wonder if it's referring to Myka, Claudia, or someone else? Can't wait!

Reply


minkhollow August 1 2011, 22:05:19 UTC
How are we already a third of the way through the season? I mean, seriously.

Reply

abbysiuta August 1 2011, 23:32:15 UTC
Dopn't think that way... Think still 2/3 left! (I try to do that, sometimes it works...)

And there is Xmas again...

Reply


minkhollow August 2 2011, 01:14:50 UTC
GRANT'S FLASK IS WITH REENACTORS, I CALLED THAT

And that was one hell of a pratfall at 'she says she's your ex-wife.' SMOOTH, PETE

AWWWWWWW. I want to say this was a fairly amicable split, from what little we've seen so far. (And does this mean Pete's stuff finally arrived?)

DON'T PICK UP THE ARTIFACT, PETE'S EX-WIFE THAT WE DIDN'T KNOW HE HAD! Hmm, Egyptian beehive, and... from the title of the episode, is this where we get some Cleopatra action?

...oh, Pete. The drinking. Oh, PETE. ::HUGS HIM::

A LIFETIME COMMITMENT EH?

Awwwwwwww, Pete. ARTIE'S LAW OF ARTIFACTS. NOW YOU CAN PANIC.

Reply


craving_vintage August 2 2011, 01:17:07 UTC
Now Pete and the gang is going to have to go to the wedding and his ex is going to think he's there to stop her from getting married.

Reply


minkhollow August 2 2011, 01:24:19 UTC
...AWWWWWW, STEVE. And Claudia telling him the full Joshua backstory.

--Claudia's giving the Artifact + reenactors = BAD JUJU speech I was expecting from Artie! I AM NOT SHIRLEY!

So we're going for a queen bee kind of thing here, I'm thinking. And that's gonna be FUUUUUN when Pete gets there ISN'T IT

YES IT IS. And I feel like 'take care of the in-laws' was a BAD THING TO SAY, though the bridal party carrying them off was pretty hilarious.

Reply

craving_vintage August 2 2011, 01:33:22 UTC
As soon as she said take care of the in-laws, I'm like oh, no. lol

Reply


Leave a comment

Up