rioting in Dublin

Feb 25, 2006 16:25

RTÉ, BBC. Mildly disappointed to note that the BBC reports it as a "Republican riot"; it's no more a Republican riot than the annual May Day fracas is a socialist riot. Per the Irish Times coverage, which I'm not linking because they're a registration-requiring shower of suckweasels:The violence that swept O'Connell St in Dublin is spreading to ( Read more... )

politics, dublin, northern ireland, stupidity, ireland

Leave a comment

Comments 12

anonymous February 25 2006, 16:53:13 UTC
Obviously the Irish times can mindread now.

Reply

waider February 25 2006, 16:56:31 UTC
This scintillating commentary brought to you by Smart Telecom. Geez. Bloody anonymous posters. I really should filter them.

Reply


Weird mopti February 25 2006, 17:43:50 UTC
I cannot figure who gains from the riot. Sinn Fein can expect to lose some of the soft-"we've-officially-given-up-violence-haven't-we-Mary-Lou-McDonald" vote, but I doubt the PDs engineered the lads to throw the bricks to get that outcome.

Reply

Re: Weird eejitalmuppet February 25 2006, 17:58:45 UTC
The Beeb article linked it to "Republican Sinn Fein", as opposed to Sinn Fein proper. You and waider are probably better-placed than I to judge the likelihood of that.

Reply

Re: Weird waider February 25 2006, 18:00:56 UTC
Sure, but linked to them as organisers of the counter-protest. Doesn't make them organisers of the riot (although granted it's entirely possible).

Reply

Re: Weird eejitalmuppet February 25 2006, 18:04:44 UTC
Fair point. There's a large part of me that thinks that organising a counter-protest is always likely to result in trouble, because the planet has no shortage of assholes (I'm tempted to compare to the small number of idiots it takes to start a soccer riot, but that's perhaps a little tastelss, given the subject matter surrounding the events in Dublin) . . .

Reply


waider February 26 2006, 02:18:14 UTC
Yup, card-carrying republicans every one of 'em, eh?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up