One more reason that music journalism is total bullshit:
From
Pitchfork's review of Weezer's "Make Believe": "[...] it calls into question whether The Blue Album was really that great, or whether it just stood out as a rare beacon of guitar pop in a grunge-obsessed era."
From
Chartattack.com's review of Weezer's "Make Believe": "Comparing their
(
Read more... )
Comments 22
Reply
and here comes an overly vehement assault:
There's like three or four seminal albums for people of our age group now that we all listened to in high school in some combination or another whether we care to admit it or not, and those were Nirvana's NEVERMIND, THE BLUE ALBUM, Green Day's DOOKIE, Offspring's SMASH...and..fuck, I dunno. Like The Cranberries or Alice in Chains or NIN if you were really cool/weird. I'm really annoyed that fucking hipster journalists keep denying the importance and resonance of the bands that I grew up with. It's offensive. SHUT UP!!!!
Reply
Because the second- and third-waves of Weezer fans are so huge, with a whole bunch of people who heard the first two albums in the period between Pinkerton and Green (if not later), you've got a significant chunk of Weezer fans who never experienced their first two albums in that specific musical/cultural context. So I don't think "Weezer were never good, just different" is an adequate explanation of what happened to their career. Of course, we're starting to get far enough out of the '90s that the '90s rock canon is now more open for debate/shooting practice, so I think we'll be seeing more and more of this about a lot of bands soon.
Obviously, I love guitar pop, so I really like Weezer.
Reply
Reply
Reply
-Sofi
Reply
you know, the whole nine yards
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment