Comments | virtuistic: Mathemolitics

virtuistic

Mathemolitics

Dec 14, 2007 17:57

There is a presidential election looming on the far horizon. Bearing that in mind, I have sound political reasoning that will help ease your decision by removing a contender.

Do NOT Vote for Hillary Clinton.
This is not about my distrust of her sincerity. Nor is it really even about her downward-spiraling campaign1. It's about mathI know, I know ( Read more... )

creative solutions, waxing op-ed, omg, politics, from ur friendly neighborhood journalist, not okay

Comments 30

bamzerlime December 15 2007, 04:05:44 UTC

agreed! mathemolitics haha

virtuistic December 15 2007, 23:24:55 UTC

Can't argue with sound reasoning! XD

bullet4fob December 15 2007, 04:39:28 UTC

who should i vote for then????

virtuistic December 15 2007, 23:23:28 UTC

That's up to you. :) As I am totally against trying to make someone vote for my preferred candidate, I would counsel doing some brief campaign research.

Although, I would like to add that you should Not vote for Ron Paul, because of the blimp. That update will be coming soon.

bullet4fob December 19 2007, 05:32:29 UTC

I can assure you that I will never, ever ever vote for Ron Paul. I'm going to vote for Huckabee in the Kansas caucus. I really hope he becomes the Republican nominee so I can vote for him again.

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Huckabee is a nut virtuistic December 30 2007, 16:43:10 UTC

But he's Chuck Norris approved. Heh.

(The comment has been removed)

Re: Huckabee is a nut virtuistic January 3 2008, 01:33:16 UTC

That figure, while interesting, is also blatantly false. I heard a story on MPR where they took a statistic spouted from each of the candidates and proved it wrong. I'm now upset with every single candidate.