Kingdom of Heaven

May 05, 2005 21:30

First impressions ( Read more... )

films, orlando bloom

Leave a comment

Comments 4

dangermousie May 5 2005, 19:55:42 UTC
Sounds good to me. The real story is actually much more believable and yet truly fascinating. I guess they wanted to give Balian a "common touch."

Re: not much of anything. The Director's cut is going to be over an hour longer and I think those problems will be smoothed away.

Reply

dangermousie May 5 2005, 20:34:58 UTC
An hour longer??? OMG! Me want NOW! :)

And what of Balian's character, I agree with you on that. I think if they would've portrayed him straight away as the baron he really was, without this blacksmith part of the deal, his character would've been more difficult to approach. I mean for the majority of the viewers. ("So why's this nobleman all noble, huh?") Easier to relate to someone, who's had it worse than most of us.

I happen to know the real history of this period pretty well (I'm doing research on the Hospitaller Order) and yet (or because of it?) thoroughly enjoyed the movie. And not just because Orlando is jaw-droppingly gorgeous. Just so we're clear on that. ;)

Johanna

Reply

vierran45 May 5 2005, 20:41:53 UTC
Interesting. I only know bits and pieces of the history of the period, so could you recommend some book on the period, because after seeing the film, I'm interested to learn more.

Or I could, of course, reread Judith Tarr's Alamut and The Dagger and the Cross, plus the preceding trilogy, which are historical fantasys set in the same period. Very good ones, BTW.

Reply

vierran45 May 5 2005, 20:45:30 UTC
And agree about Orlando's looks in the film ;-).

BTW, I agree about the resemblance of his look in KoH to Vivek in Kisna, that someone on my f-list mentioned.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up