Apr 14, 2008 11:14
What is up with the burly detectivism in Tin Man? Never have I encountered a fandom so dead set on replacing characters' names and pronouns with ridiculous sounding proxies. And passive voice! With a verb that takes an object! How can that even sound right to an author?
ETA: Ye gods and little fishes! *stares at ballooning comments*
fandom,
tin man,
fic,
grammar
Leave a comment
Unless it's the tightness of Cain's pants. That can never be overstated.
Reply
Heh, I have mild dyslexia, and it never stopped me from paying attention to the spell-check squiggles. (Just don't ask me to distinguish "how" and "who".)
several people claimed to have been educated in the U.S. and further claimed to have NEVER BEEN TAUGHT GRAMMAR. Some actually said that "grammar isn't taught in schools here anymore."I'll go on record as another person who wasn't taught a lick of grammar in public schools. It wasn't until I started taking Latin (sophomore year of college) that I learned what a direct object was. Before then I was an osmosis writer ( ... )
Reply
Reply
...although I got a 5 on my AP exam and a 32 on the Lit portion of the ACT, so the method kind of works, I guess.
Reply
Reply
And that's not old. Old is...old. My brain has failed me.
Reply
Word.
Reply
Leave a comment