I'm wondering if another paper is hacking the NotW. A lot of yesterday's news seemed oddly sourced, in a "we've heard that police may have contacted (group of victims)" way.
(in short, they accuse Murdoch of attempting to just make the whole scandal disappear by scapegoating junior staff whilst simultaneously removing an anti-trust objection to the BskyB deal).
Someone on twitter described it as "best-selling", but my cursory googling only turned up reliable-looking[*] descriptions of it as the best-selling Sunday paper.
The figures from Japan are pretty unreliable: they inflate them by forcing distributors to take extra copies that remain unsold. But yes, they do like their papers there.
I think the ToI figures are also pretty dubious, but it certainly was coming up fast on the NotW, whether or not it had actually overtaken it. The trouble is that 'circulation' has many definitions, and it's hard to compare like with like across different countries.
Comments 31
Reply
Reply
http://www.nuj.org.uk/innerPagenuj.html?docid=2152
(in short, they accuse Murdoch of attempting to just make the whole scandal disappear by scapegoating junior staff whilst simultaneously removing an anti-trust objection to the BskyB deal).
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
[*] Why yes, I do mean "on Wikipedia".
Reply
Reply
I think the ToI figures are also pretty dubious, but it certainly was coming up fast on the NotW, whether or not it had actually overtaken it. The trouble is that 'circulation' has many definitions, and it's hard to compare like with like across different countries.
Reply
Leave a comment