As you know, I am quite miffed at J.K. Rowling for not letting her readers make their own minds up about what happens to the characters after the last book.
Her most recent offense is a
Weasley Family Tree which gives the first and middle names of (all?) the children of Harry's kids' generation
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
(The comment has been removed)
If only it were that easy! All the knowledge I've come by has been from internet news headlines, people telling me, or from reading what seemed like perfectly innocent articles that popped in quotes from Rowling on the subject. I went and looked at this family tree because all the "news" in it had already been posted on a friend's blog.
I was disappointed about Neville and Luna too.
Love the fanartist you've got in your icon.
Reply
Otherwise I would never have known that Percy has a daughter named Molly, which is my name, and another named Lucy, which is my beloved late dog's name. COINCIDENCE? ...yes, probably, but still.
Reply
I kind of don't believe that Charlie wouldn't get married. And I wonder who this Audrey is, who married Percy? But it makes me sniffly to think that Percy named his first child after his mum.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(*sigh* but did it have to be "Hugo"?)
Reply
Though I love George/Angelina. Love it. And the fact that Charlie never marries makes me wonder if he's not gay. Though if he were I wish she'd pair him with a guy.
Also, glad she confirmed that James is named James Sirius. Anything else wouldn't be right. And Lily Luna! How cute!
Reply
Oh yeah, and I feel vindicated - when there was a mild "whaaa no kid named Sirius or Fred?" uproar I assumed George had a Fred and James was James Sirius (as did many people, I imagine).
Reply
Leave a comment