2/2 [Also private to Reeve//Unhackable]electroniclyMay 6 2008, 21:34:28 UTC
Yes, I have. And don’t worry about the absence, such things happen…
Who is it? The persons I am assigned to observe have not made any suspicious moves lately- or in the entire two weeks I have been watching-, so at very least I would prefer to be able at least know for certain who is involved and watch what they post on the network. I’ll keep my distance in person, but I make no promises I won’t interfere if it looks like the two of you are going to be killed or any promises I will completely sever contact with you- the odds are small, even if not zero, that one of my filters could be broken without my knowledge of it.
[Private to Amanda//Unhackable]urbandevMay 6 2008, 21:45:39 UTC
His name is Sephiroth. His network alias appears to be resurrectedgod.
Amanda, please promise me you won't confront him. This is not me being overprotective; he's that terrible. I can't even imagine the criteria that would induce him to kill you; he might do it just to amuse himself.
[Private to Reeve//Unhackable] (Real last edit here...)electroniclyMay 6 2008, 22:22:42 UTC
Ah; easy enough to remember.
Watching is not confrontation. Like I said, I’ll be keeping my distance, though from the implication that this is someone who needs no provocation, I think it would be better for me to have a plan in case he confronts me just because I was in seeing distance through pure bad luck.
I won’t let anyone die senselessly, though…
If it comes down to a confrontation with the police, I’ll do what the warden assigns me to.
Maybe I’m a little paranoid, but…I do wonder why alert the authorities through me rather than directly contact the warden and just ask me to stay away. Is this warning also intended to be recorded as an anonymous tip to get the attention of the police or possible official surveillance while having the source of the information be kept hidden from outside eyes?
[OOC: Fail mun is fail and forgot part of that would only be pre-reset knowledge since it probably wouldn’t have been included in her notes on the City. ._. Anyway, first strike gone, second can be visible if he wants to go into that
( ... )
Comments 8
Reply
Who is it? The persons I am assigned to observe have not made any suspicious moves lately- or in the entire two weeks I have been watching-, so at very least I would prefer to be able at least know for certain who is involved and watch what they post on the network. I’ll keep my distance in person, but I make no promises I won’t interfere if it looks like the two of you are going to be killed or any promises I will completely sever contact with you- the odds are small, even if not zero, that one of my filters could be broken without my knowledge of it.
[OOC: Stupid minor(?) hero complex.]
Reply
Amanda, please promise me you won't confront him. This is not me being overprotective; he's that terrible. I can't even imagine the criteria that would induce him to kill you; he might do it just to amuse himself.
Reply
Watching is not confrontation. Like I said, I’ll be keeping my distance, though from the implication that this is someone who needs no provocation, I think it would be better for me to have a plan in case he confronts me just because I was in seeing distance through pure bad luck.
I won’t let anyone die senselessly, though…
If it comes down to a confrontation with the police, I’ll do what the warden assigns me to.
Maybe I’m a little paranoid, but…I do wonder why alert the authorities through me rather than directly contact the warden and just ask me to stay away. Is this warning also intended to be recorded as an anonymous tip to get the attention of the police or possible official surveillance while having the source of the information be kept hidden from outside eyes?
[OOC: Fail mun is fail and forgot part of that would only be pre-reset knowledge since it probably wouldn’t have been included in her notes on the City. ._. Anyway, first strike gone, second can be visible if he wants to go into that ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment