First: "Doctors destroy health" is nonsense. Politics interfering with doctors destroys health. Second: "Lawyers destroy justice" implies that the purpose of a lawyer is to enable or encourage justice. It is not. The purpose of a lawyer is to navigate the law, regardless of justice. JUDGES and JURIES are supposed to do justice. Third: "Universities destroy knowledge" is nonsense. Politics interfering with universities destroys knowledge. Fourth, Fifth, no argument. Sixth: This is not new. Religion has always run counter to morality and been detrimental to society. Implying that this is a recent thing also incorrectly implies that this has not always been the case. Seventh: This is accurate, except that the organisations destroying the economy are not "banks", they are "organisations that are ALSO banks in addition to being destructive". They're a parasite on a bank, that also does the bank stuff. Were they simply banks, they would not be this kind of a problem.
Comments 1
First: "Doctors destroy health" is nonsense. Politics interfering with doctors destroys health.
Second: "Lawyers destroy justice" implies that the purpose of a lawyer is to enable or encourage justice. It is not. The purpose of a lawyer is to navigate the law, regardless of justice. JUDGES and JURIES are supposed to do justice.
Third: "Universities destroy knowledge" is nonsense. Politics interfering with universities destroys knowledge.
Fourth, Fifth, no argument.
Sixth: This is not new. Religion has always run counter to morality and been detrimental to society. Implying that this is a recent thing also incorrectly implies that this has not always been the case.
Seventh: This is accurate, except that the organisations destroying the economy are not "banks", they are "organisations that are ALSO banks in addition to being destructive". They're a parasite on a bank, that also does the bank stuff. Were they simply banks, they would not be this kind of a problem.
So yeah, whoever this dude is, he's kinda
Reply
Leave a comment