Did anyone see this on Channel 4 last night? I'll try and pick it up on a catch-up service when I have a moment, but
this article on the subject by the presenter is interesting reading. Although, being the Telegraph, many of the comments are frankly scary
(
Read more... )
Comments 23
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
What is your heritage, if I may ask?
Reply
Mm, any discussion of "race", even in a scientific context, is often likely to go wrong. Yet clearly people find it an intuitively useful concept, however shaky the rationale.
Reply
Genetic diversity is often good for overall disease resistance.
However, many genes became widespread in populations in order to deal with specific local risks like malaria or TB. In those cases, inbreeding may be better if the population is still subject to the original health problem. (An adaptation may be useless or even dangerous in the absence of the original threat)
Reply
Reply
IIRC, Kat used to say that in Hawaii they say that hapa (mixed race) people are more beautiful.
Reply
(This is, I think, partly for historico-cultural reasons going back to when the Indo-European people who now predominate in India conquered / subjected the darker-skinned people who lived there previously. The caste system partly existed to make sure these groups were not mixed. So while I wouldn't say there's exactly a stigma about being dark-skinned, it's certainly seen as a looks disadvantage.)
Reply
Leave a comment