Is It Better to be Mixed Race?

Nov 03, 2009 13:04

Did anyone see this on Channel 4 last night? I'll try and pick it up on a catch-up service when I have a moment, but this article on the subject by the presenter is interesting reading. Although, being the Telegraph, many of the comments are frankly scary ( Read more... )

science, tv

Leave a comment

Comments 23

No, I didn't see it fractalgeek November 3 2009, 13:25:12 UTC
The Metro this morning summed it up as "Annoyingly smug presenter; whatever you gain in hybrid vigour, you lose in the stress and disadvantages of prejudice"

Reply

Re: No, I didn't see it undyingking November 3 2009, 15:19:32 UTC
Mm, right. Levels of prejudice vary a lot depending on where you live, of course.

Reply


secondhand_rick November 3 2009, 13:29:31 UTC
This seems like common sense to the complete layman that is me (apart from you being attractive, of course).

Reply

undyingking November 3 2009, 15:20:08 UTC
... which is extremely uncommon sense.

Reply


karohemd November 3 2009, 13:47:50 UTC
When I saw that in the TV guide I thought, urk, this can only go wrong so I didn't watch it.

What is your heritage, if I may ask?

Reply

undyingking November 3 2009, 15:22:40 UTC
My mother is British (half English, half Scots) and my father is from north India.

Mm, any discussion of "race", even in a scientific context, is often likely to go wrong. Yet clearly people find it an intuitively useful concept, however shaky the rationale.

Reply


watervole November 3 2009, 14:40:37 UTC
It's going to depend on the specific health question.

Genetic diversity is often good for overall disease resistance.

However, many genes became widespread in populations in order to deal with specific local risks like malaria or TB. In those cases, inbreeding may be better if the population is still subject to the original health problem. (An adaptation may be useless or even dangerous in the absence of the original threat)

Reply

undyingking November 3 2009, 15:27:37 UTC
Mm, also applies I guess to eg. adaptations to a prevalent local diet.

Reply


floralaetifica November 3 2009, 14:42:45 UTC
"I'm living proof (or possibly disproof) of the bit about mixed-race people being more attractive"

IIRC, Kat used to say that in Hawaii they say that hapa (mixed race) people are more beautiful.

Reply

undyingking November 3 2009, 15:37:06 UTC
Mm, it's the perception in India too, as long as the race being mixed with is lighter-skinned. Mixing with a darker-skinned race would not generally be seen as enhancing attractiveness.

(This is, I think, partly for historico-cultural reasons going back to when the Indo-European people who now predominate in India conquered / subjected the darker-skinned people who lived there previously. The caste system partly existed to make sure these groups were not mixed. So while I wouldn't say there's exactly a stigma about being dark-skinned, it's certainly seen as a looks disadvantage.)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up