4th Ed

Jun 19, 2009 00:01

Is ok.

I'm scared.

I swore I'd hate it.  Why god(s)?  Why!?

Not as good as 2.0.  WAY better than 3.5.  Not sure how it equates with 3.0 yet.

Leave a comment

Comments 2

mrcorvin June 19 2009, 13:13:26 UTC
I do like the skill setup of 3/3.5 better then in 4.

Other then that, Combat seems to flow a bit easier.

Reply

umbravenatir June 19 2009, 18:34:55 UTC
I like the class/path set up more than I like class/prestige class. It reminds me of the Kits from 2.0, which I found to be better written and more appropriate/less power-gamey than Prestige Classes (which I still enjoyed somewhat, there were just so many of them).

I also like the races. They remind me of 2.0 races (or Star Wars d20). I prefer a solid grouping of bennies as opposed to some sort of induced balance of benefits and penalties.

(Of course, I also preferred the basic class/professional class/prestige class set up of d20 Modern/Future to 3.0/3.5 too...)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up