The title of my roommate's recent post
"Does this count as filk? I hope not." and one of the comments about it, have brought to my mind some very interesting questions about the definition of filk.
I think what filkers call filk and what non-filker sci-fi fans call filk are not always the same. If
londo had posted his parody on a filk list, it's
(
Read more... )
Comments 48
I think that a great case study in this question would be the reaction to Luke Ski being the filk guest of honor at Arisia.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I won't complain about the additional exposure - it's an unlocked post for a reason.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've heard some good filk, but I guess the bad won out. Bad filk produces two emotions: the mortification of listening to a tone deaf acquaintance sing his heart out in public, and the disdain for someone who unjustly thinks himself terribly clever.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The one statement you've made that I find curious is about there being a lack of "participatory" music in filk. Whereas filk's basic ethos or ethic if you will, at its core, is all about participation -- about the seasoned performers (and, quite frankly, many of the most seasoned musicians I've heard have been in filk contexts) and the amateurs alike taking their turns in the circle, supporting/encouraging one another, harmonizing, etc. So I'm just curious as to where that perception comes from, or if I'm misunderstanding you. Thanks.
Reply
I've also seen cats at dog shows; doesn't mean they had much to do there.
The one statement you've made that I find curious is about there being a lack of "participatory" music in filk.
Speaking as an enduring fan of filk music and filksings, and as a non-filker musician, you're exemplifying two of the big blind-spots of the filk community.
1) Filk circles are the least participatory musical activity that I go to that isn't just frankly a concert where you're supposed to shut up and listen. Filkers have an astonishingly low bar for what qualifies as "participatory": you think turn-taking is participatory. Participatory to most instrumentalists (and many singers) is almost the opposite of turn-taking. A filk circles are, as you say, all about taking turns -- practical upshot being that a filk circle involves something like 90% listening to other people, and 10% music making, per participant. ( ... )
Reply
A few weeks ago, I was at FilKONtario, and in the filk circle we had a violinist, a flutist, a dulcimerist, a full rock band, several guitarists, etc. And it wasn't a case that, as you imply, OK, everyone shuts up until it's your "turn." The violinist probably played on about half the songs in the evening, for instance -- adding accents and improvisations and so forth as she desired. She wasn't asked to, or asked not to -- she just did it, and everybody liked it. That's not uncommon, from my observation. Indeed, it's common in most of the filk circles I've attended (note the emphasis -- it may be different in your neck of the woods) -- for people to welcome any and all musicians in the room to jump in ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment