That's just what I need...

[linear_flower]

I checked all of July and August (these were introduced June 30th of this year), and I didn't see these snarked.

I introduce to you... Winkers!

Comments

[sleepsong]

::hands your brain bleach and the paper towel she just used to clean lamb stew off her screen::

[sugarcane_moon]

...What kind of a market are these directed at? Who would want these?

[handsomejin]

What.

[vtgrrl]

NO! OMG NO! Ok, you win the internets. This? Is the ugliest concept I have ever seen.

Let's take pants, and then put tongue in cheek illustrations on the ASS to draw attention to the fact that the wearer has a less than silicone-perfect rear, and then...

I can't even continue. You win. Nuff said.

[kid_lit_fan]

I think that the crappy fit is making rears look even less perfect--unless I'm completely off, the "winking" doesn't work unless they're too tight around the butt and a bit looser around the thigh, which is unflattering on anyone (they're not tight in that Apple Bottoms way, they're tight in that FLATTEN THAT SUCKER OUT! way, and that doesn't look good on any rear, whether it's "perfect", big, or naturally a bit on the flat side.

I watched the video. Some of them don't even work right. Like the owl and the eyes at the very end aren't winking, because part of the eyeball continues to show. The clapboards on this video are particularly amusing--the pants are so loose on him that they don't "wink" at all. This is advertising?

[georgiamagnolia]

your icon is full of win!

[perceptual]

Oh good god, my eyes...

(ahharhar)