Not. Sexy.

Feb 06, 2008 22:21

I love Victoria's Secret, so much so that I have a store credit card and am on their mailing list and all, which is cool because I get promos and catalogs and free stuff a lot.

But I swear to god, they make some seriously ugly dresses.


Read more... )

fug dresses, just rolled outta bed

Leave a comment

Comments 46

(The comment has been removed)

reijigin February 7 2008, 03:37:43 UTC
I wouldn't hang that shit up in my house.

Reply


ohgollygeedamn February 7 2008, 03:35:34 UTC
I kind of like it, especially in some of the other colours. It'd be great for the beach to wear over bathers (or maybe it's just me 8D).

Reply

reijigin February 7 2008, 03:37:17 UTC
I would actually considering buying it in the white/light blue combo as a beach cover up if it wasn't $55. It would be good for going to the lake or something. At the pool I'd wear something less ugly.

Reply

ohgollygeedamn February 7 2008, 03:40:18 UTC
Very true, there are probably are a lot of less pricey (and perhaps slightly nicer) equivalents around. I was also leaning towards the blue and white one though.

Reply

maga_culinae February 7 2008, 03:47:44 UTC
That's what I was thinking.

Reply


wazira_sharira February 7 2008, 03:36:49 UTC
I would totally wear that. Not in that color, but the red one looks nice.

Reply

reijigin February 7 2008, 03:38:41 UTC
Yeah some of the colors are okay now. For years, though, it was this lime green/orange combination, and that was it.

Reply

thegirlsheriff February 7 2008, 12:15:30 UTC
I like the tickled pink one.

Reply


seethingheathen February 7 2008, 03:36:50 UTC
I would totally wear that. Maybe I'm just weird.

Reply


kightp February 7 2008, 03:38:27 UTC
Heh. I *did* wear dressed pretty much like that. In, oh, about 1972.

They were fugly then, too. Now I suppose they're retro.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up