Социальные работники Лондонского округа Мертон требуют закрыть уже два моих блога. Суд завтра
Кафка отдыхает, как только что прокомментировала моя подруга. Рехнуться можно, но таковы реальности Великобритании. Завтра в Лондоне должен, оказывается, состояться суд, где будет рассматриваться вопрос о закрытиии сразу двух моих блогов: вот этого русскоязычного ЖЖ, который вы сейчас читаете, и англоязычного блога http://save-katya.livejournal.com/ . Социальные службы Лондонского округа Мертон подали в суд на журналистку Лайлу Брице и меня, как соответчицу, требуя закрыть оба мои блога на основании того, что там опубликована информация о четырехлетней Кате Брице http://turtaniat.livejournal.com/2317552.html . Той самой, которую работники Лондонского округа Мертон обманом и подлогом документов увели от матери и теперь готовят ребенку насильственное удочерение. Соединенными усилиями и при подключении британского юриста в звании бакалавра мы выяснили, что в деле Кати нарушены не только Конвенция ООН по правам ребенка http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/childcon.shtml и Гаагская конвенция о защите детей и сотрудничестве в области иностранного усыновления http://www.usynovite.ru/documents/international/convention_int/
но и ряд британских законов. Как я понимаю, именно грядущее обнародование этих фактов и беспокоит социальных работников Лондонского округа Мертон. Правда, они прикрывают этот свой шкурный интерес "заботой" об интересах четырехлетней Кати, которую, как печалится социальная работница Рут Уилкинсон, в этом случае будет сложно передать на насильственное, то есть без согласия матери, удочерение. Вот пришла записка от Лайлы (увы, англоязычная) и ряд связанных с завтрашним судом документов. Публикую почти все. Записка от Лайлы:
Dear all,
please see the document attached - I have just received the Notice about the Injunction Hearing for tomorrow, the 19 th October 2012.
As you can see from the scanned document attached, the LA of the London Borough of Merton did not give me the time to get legal advice.
However I will try to be in touch.
I am going to the court tomorrow with my oldest daughter Mayja Zargarjana and my Partner Marc Hedman (see their details on CC), although I am not sure whether they will be allowed by the Judge to get in the courtroom.
I would like to remind you that I and Marc Hedman have filed the FP2 Form (Application Notice about revocation a Placement Order) with the Inner London Family&Proceedings Court yesterday.
I am still awaiting for the written notes of the Judgment issued on the 8 th October 2012 by the HHJ Judge Cryan who had dismissed our Appeals on the 8 Th October 2012 ...
Once I get the Written Notes I am going to lodge the Appeal with the Court of Appeal.
Regards
Laila Brice
Документ первый, в котором говорится, что на предыдущем слушании, где судья отказал Лайле в аппеляции по поводу отзыва ордера о помещении ее дочери на насильственное удочерение и отзыве ордера опеки, судья также потребовал в Лайлы, чтобы содержание вебсайта, где говорится об ее дочери, было удалено. (Ну, это мой ЖЖ, точнее - оба моих ЖЖ). И они хотят, чтобы Лайла удалила оба - ибо у них есть подозрения, что блог таки пишет она - ну, об этом говорит фраза на фотографии «Спасите мою дочь от насильственного удочерения» - “Save my daughter Katya from the forced adoption”. Социальная работница Рут Уилкинсон, которая произвела этот шедевр на свет, убеждена, что, поскольку речь идет о «моей дочери», а дочь эта - Лайлы, то и блог пишет она.:)) Никогда не подозревала, что Лайла интересуется российской политикой, ага.:) В общем, читайте сами, я сейчас отдельным текстом сброшу продолжение сего англоязычного наставления. Хотя может и этого хватит.
Authority will seek an injunction from the judge on Monday (when you are next
in court).
I recognise that this is a very difficult time for yourself and Maiya but we have
to seek you cooperation with this request'
Best wishes,
Nick Rumball".
On Friday October sth 2012 Ms Brice emailed back to Mr Rumball
stating that the website was not hers but the action of a friend of hers
who is a journalist.
On Monday Bth October 2012, we were in Court for the judgment in
the appeals by Ms Brice and her adult daughter, Ms Zargarjana,
against the care and placement orders. At the conclusion of the
judgment the Local Authority sought the assistance of the court in
having the content of the website removed'
ln court, Ms Brice repeated her position that the website had been
set up by a friend of hers. His Honour Judge cryan asked Ms Brice
to ensure that the contents of the website were removed and Ms
Brice indicated that she would not do so because her friend is "a free
citizen in a free society". The Local Authority therefore indicated to
the Judge that it would make a formal application to the Court if this
matter could not be resolved by agreement'
Ms Brice indicated in court that the Local Authority already had the
contact details for her friend in Dublin who has set up the website'
However, the Local Authority can find no trace of this e-mail address.
I therefore e-mailed Ms Brice on 9th October 2A12 to request that she
sent me these details. This was so that the Local Authority could
contact this person directly and request that she remove this website'
Ms Brice did not provide this person's contact details' Her response
was received by e-mail on 1Sth october 2012 and read:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Dear Ruth
I have forwarded your email to Tatiana Turchina, so she has your contact details
and will be able to contact you directly.
Regards
Laila
The Local Authority has not so far received any communication from
Ms Turchina directly. However, I note that on 14th October 2012, the
website was updated with a post detailing the Local Authority's
request for this information [EXHIBIT RW2l. This is further evidence
that Ms Brice is fuelling the content of this website'
Since the matter was raised in Court, further information has been
added to the website. This includes the outcome of the hearing on
8th October when both appeals were refused. lt is clear that Ms Brice
is colluding with the author of the website by providing information to
her friend about the Court proceedings'
Since the appeal hearing concluded on Bth October 2012, it came to
the attention of the Local Authority that the same person appears to
have set up a second website:
http ://tu rta n i at. I ivejo u rna L co m/2 3 1 7 552. htm I
10. The text on this website is entirely in Russian and consequently we
do not know exactly what it says, save for the title page which says
,,save my daughter Katya from the forced adoption!" The Local
Authority believes that the reference to "my daughter" is further
evidence of the direct involvement of Ms Brice in these websites'
11. This website contains a number of photos that relate to Catherine,
her family, and the court process. These are exhibited to this
statement [EXHIBIT RW3].
8.
L
12. The local authority seeks to have the content on the websites
removed as they are a clear contempt of court. The Local Authority is
also concerned that the photographs and the details about Catherine
that are shown on these sites could be prejudicialto her successful
adoption.
12. As the Local Authority does not currently have any way to contact the
person whom Ms Brice claims manages these websites, and
consequently cannot request her cooperation, serve her with this
application or with any order that the Court may make following this
application, the Local Authority is seeking an order against Ms Brice
in the first instance. The Local Authority seeks an order that Ms
Brice provides the contact details for her friend, that she uses her
best endeavours to ensure that both websites are removed, and that
she stops providing information about Catherine to the author of
these websites.
Signed Date.
Ruth Wilkinson
SocialWorker
но и ряд британских законов. Как я понимаю, именно грядущее обнародование этих фактов и беспокоит социальных работников Лондонского округа Мертон. Правда, они прикрывают этот свой шкурный интерес "заботой" об интересах четырехлетней Кати, которую, как печалится социальная работница Рут Уилкинсон, в этом случае будет сложно передать на насильственное, то есть без согласия матери, удочерение. Вот пришла записка от Лайлы (увы, англоязычная) и ряд связанных с завтрашним судом документов. Публикую почти все. Записка от Лайлы:
Dear all,
please see the document attached - I have just received the Notice about the Injunction Hearing for tomorrow, the 19 th October 2012.
As you can see from the scanned document attached, the LA of the London Borough of Merton did not give me the time to get legal advice.
However I will try to be in touch.
I am going to the court tomorrow with my oldest daughter Mayja Zargarjana and my Partner Marc Hedman (see their details on CC), although I am not sure whether they will be allowed by the Judge to get in the courtroom.
I would like to remind you that I and Marc Hedman have filed the FP2 Form (Application Notice about revocation a Placement Order) with the Inner London Family&Proceedings Court yesterday.
I am still awaiting for the written notes of the Judgment issued on the 8 th October 2012 by the HHJ Judge Cryan who had dismissed our Appeals on the 8 Th October 2012 ...
Once I get the Written Notes I am going to lodge the Appeal with the Court of Appeal.
Regards
Laila Brice
Документ первый, в котором говорится, что на предыдущем слушании, где судья отказал Лайле в аппеляции по поводу отзыва ордера о помещении ее дочери на насильственное удочерение и отзыве ордера опеки, судья также потребовал в Лайлы, чтобы содержание вебсайта, где говорится об ее дочери, было удалено. (Ну, это мой ЖЖ, точнее - оба моих ЖЖ). И они хотят, чтобы Лайла удалила оба - ибо у них есть подозрения, что блог таки пишет она - ну, об этом говорит фраза на фотографии «Спасите мою дочь от насильственного удочерения» - “Save my daughter Katya from the forced adoption”. Социальная работница Рут Уилкинсон, которая произвела этот шедевр на свет, убеждена, что, поскольку речь идет о «моей дочери», а дочь эта - Лайлы, то и блог пишет она.:)) Никогда не подозревала, что Лайла интересуется российской политикой, ага.:) В общем, читайте сами, я сейчас отдельным текстом сброшу продолжение сего англоязычного наставления. Хотя может и этого хватит.
Authority will seek an injunction from the judge on Monday (when you are next
in court).
I recognise that this is a very difficult time for yourself and Maiya but we have
to seek you cooperation with this request'
Best wishes,
Nick Rumball".
On Friday October sth 2012 Ms Brice emailed back to Mr Rumball
stating that the website was not hers but the action of a friend of hers
who is a journalist.
On Monday Bth October 2012, we were in Court for the judgment in
the appeals by Ms Brice and her adult daughter, Ms Zargarjana,
against the care and placement orders. At the conclusion of the
judgment the Local Authority sought the assistance of the court in
having the content of the website removed'
ln court, Ms Brice repeated her position that the website had been
set up by a friend of hers. His Honour Judge cryan asked Ms Brice
to ensure that the contents of the website were removed and Ms
Brice indicated that she would not do so because her friend is "a free
citizen in a free society". The Local Authority therefore indicated to
the Judge that it would make a formal application to the Court if this
matter could not be resolved by agreement'
Ms Brice indicated in court that the Local Authority already had the
contact details for her friend in Dublin who has set up the website'
However, the Local Authority can find no trace of this e-mail address.
I therefore e-mailed Ms Brice on 9th October 2A12 to request that she
sent me these details. This was so that the Local Authority could
contact this person directly and request that she remove this website'
Ms Brice did not provide this person's contact details' Her response
was received by e-mail on 1Sth october 2012 and read:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Dear Ruth
I have forwarded your email to Tatiana Turchina, so she has your contact details
and will be able to contact you directly.
Regards
Laila
The Local Authority has not so far received any communication from
Ms Turchina directly. However, I note that on 14th October 2012, the
website was updated with a post detailing the Local Authority's
request for this information [EXHIBIT RW2l. This is further evidence
that Ms Brice is fuelling the content of this website'
Since the matter was raised in Court, further information has been
added to the website. This includes the outcome of the hearing on
8th October when both appeals were refused. lt is clear that Ms Brice
is colluding with the author of the website by providing information to
her friend about the Court proceedings'
Since the appeal hearing concluded on Bth October 2012, it came to
the attention of the Local Authority that the same person appears to
have set up a second website:
http ://tu rta n i at. I ivejo u rna L co m/2 3 1 7 552. htm I
10. The text on this website is entirely in Russian and consequently we
do not know exactly what it says, save for the title page which says
,,save my daughter Katya from the forced adoption!" The Local
Authority believes that the reference to "my daughter" is further
evidence of the direct involvement of Ms Brice in these websites'
11. This website contains a number of photos that relate to Catherine,
her family, and the court process. These are exhibited to this
statement [EXHIBIT RW3].
8.
L
12. The local authority seeks to have the content on the websites
removed as they are a clear contempt of court. The Local Authority is
also concerned that the photographs and the details about Catherine
that are shown on these sites could be prejudicialto her successful
adoption.
12. As the Local Authority does not currently have any way to contact the
person whom Ms Brice claims manages these websites, and
consequently cannot request her cooperation, serve her with this
application or with any order that the Court may make following this
application, the Local Authority is seeking an order against Ms Brice
in the first instance. The Local Authority seeks an order that Ms
Brice provides the contact details for her friend, that she uses her
best endeavours to ensure that both websites are removed, and that
she stops providing information about Catherine to the author of
these websites.
Signed Date.
Ruth Wilkinson
SocialWorker