Ufu!

Dec 03, 2008 13:25

Alright guys, me and Janella have a personal virus coming up that you can actually have your characters affected by, in a way.

The way our virus is going to work, Eros and Blackout are going to be hit by something that basically backfires-- it was meant to change time but it actually lapses their own and they lose a year, going back to before Eros ( Read more... )

norry

Leave a comment

death_chopper December 3 2008, 19:55:56 UTC
Chiming in to add, for anyone who knows them well enough to notice when the reset goes into effect and tries to convince them something's wrong, that entries in their journals for the year they lose will still be visible to everyone else, but not to them. If you try to link 'em to an entry, the link will be broken. If you try to copypaste, they won't be able to see the text.

And this goes for entires on DDD, too~

Reply

know_sacrifice December 3 2008, 23:09:30 UTC
"Absence of proof is not proof of absence", Mr. Edgeworth~

Reply

samriprosecutor December 3 2008, 23:25:10 UTC
...It's not proof of presence, either.

Reply

know_sacrifice December 3 2008, 23:40:56 UTC
But presence could still be there, unproven.

Reply

samriprosecutor December 3 2008, 23:44:55 UTC
It could...but in this case, it isn't.

Reply

know_sacrifice December 3 2008, 23:46:18 UTC
......

Hmph.

Whatever.

Reply

1/2 samriprosecutor December 3 2008, 23:53:22 UTC
samriprosecutor December 3 2008, 23:57:36 UTC
There's a...hint of fondness there. Her company's enjoyable more tolerable than most, and occasionally...amusing.

Reply

know_sacrifice December 3 2008, 23:58:47 UTC
Thank you.

She likes you too, Mr. Edgeworth.

Reply

samriprosecutor December 4 2008, 00:00:48 UTC
Of course she does. What's not to like?

Reply

know_sacrifice December 4 2008, 00:03:38 UTC
Well, the ego can be a turn-off sometimes~.

Reply

samriprosecutor December 4 2008, 00:05:57 UTC
Ego? I'm sure I don't know what you're talking about.

Reply

know_sacrifice December 4 2008, 00:18:50 UTC
Uh-huh. I'm sure.

Reply

samriprosecutor December 4 2008, 00:20:50 UTC
Truly. It's as groundless as Wright's preposterous suspicions about Sigi.

Reply

know_sacrifice December 4 2008, 00:24:05 UTC
Well, okay, that I don't understand. Sigi is sweet!

Reply

samriprosecutor December 4 2008, 00:27:13 UTC
He's a fine dog. Wright is simply delusional.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up