Leave a comment

Comments 15

sienata February 6 2008, 08:05:36 UTC
Oh wow... that's just lovely. thanks for sharing sweet lola's poem with us.

Reply

trascendenza February 6 2008, 08:10:19 UTC
Thanks, sweetie. ♥

Reply


big_heart_june February 6 2008, 08:54:34 UTC
So few words but such an impact....this is really beautiful, Sheera. Just, wow..What a gorgeous gift for the lovely Lola ♥

Reply

trascendenza February 6 2008, 08:58:25 UTC
Thank you so much, dearest. :)

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

trascendenza February 6 2008, 10:29:50 UTC
and thank you! ♥

Reply


lolitaray February 6 2008, 10:54:49 UTC
Oh. I just. Sheera.

I've been so longing for this and just - thank you. You know. Thank you.

Reply

trascendenza February 6 2008, 20:49:12 UTC
*hugs* And thank you for giving me the opportunity to write this. :) I think I needed it.

Reply


rhye February 6 2008, 18:18:13 UTC
The last stanza reminds me of Romeo and Juliet :) Pretty.

Reply

trascendenza February 6 2008, 20:51:51 UTC
I wouldn't have thought of that! I guess I was pretty narrowly focused when writing it, though. I feel kind of awkward about posting this poem, like, does it need an author's note that it's about Heath? But I also didn't really want to force an interpretation on anyone, so. I don't know.

Reply

rhye February 6 2008, 21:09:03 UTC
I think it's pretty clear to us who it's about, but I do think poetry in particular loses something every time the author makes illucidating comments about what they wrote. All poetry is, in my mind, meant to be open to interpretation, like Rorsarche (sp?) tests of ourselves.

One of my professors defined poetry as "news that stays news", and I think what he meant is that in your words you must capture something that, even if the objects in your poem cease to be, still has a timeless meaning. The example he gave was how The Convergence of the Twain could just as easily be about September 11 as about the Titanic. It wasn't so much about the Titanic as about the concept of a fateful disaster already waiting to befall you that you cannot concieve ( ... )

Reply

trascendenza February 7 2008, 03:07:12 UTC
Oh, man, I'm actually really glad you made this gigantic comment. Because, yeah, that's essentially what I was questioning myself about--can I post a poem that will stand in its own context? Will showing the context I wrote it in lessen its ability to be perceived on the clean slate of the reader's mind? I wonder about these things, and have come to very few satisfactory conclusions; mostly I just do whatever I feel like doing when I make the post.

"News that stays news"--that's an awesome definition. ♥

...metaphorical alchemy.
Ugh, I love that. What a gorgeous combination of words and ideas. I think that's why I come back to poetry time and time again, and when I'm blocked trying to write other things I come back to poetry. Poetry is really magical for me to write, sometimes.

Also: HI, NATERS. He looks pretty good speechless, if I do say so myself.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up