Becoming part of the solution, part 1.

[tovolia]

I, like everyone else who plays the game, have opinions on NERO. And rather than just talk about my ideas for the game and how it could be improved I am going to make use of the livejournal forums to kick around ideas. I welcome all comments, concerns, and criticisms about these ideas

Comments

Looks good to me

[anonymous]

The numbers more or less look fine to me. Depending on your own personal idea of what a rogue or templar is, you might have some issues with those numbers. There are two schools of thought about what a templar is supposed to be, and the "Scholar who can fight" school might prefer to scale up the costs just a tad to bring them in line with rogues.

And on the subject of rogues, a similar scaling of backstabs would most likely need to get put in place in at the same time. But that shouldn't be a big issue. If you can accept prof scaling, then backstab scaling is just an extension of the idea.

George

[writersblock_va]

I've never really looked very hard at the numbers for scaling profs. I've seen a couple schemes posted on the National boards, and frankly, whatever gets chosen, I'm all for it. I agree with a lot of folks, swinging 20+ is just ruining the game. I like the scaling for templars/Rouges/Scholars. I kind of think I'd lean more twords either fighters/templars being on the same page, or having Fighters with scaling profs after say, +5.

The OTHER thing I consider "busted" that has to be fixed the same time as Fighter profs is "Healing Pools", there is just a RIDICULOUS amount of healing being put out there, and if fighters get scaled, i think healing pool needs to go away or be MUCH more limited.